Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: 24STCV23545, Date: 2025-01-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV23545 Hearing Date: January 27, 2025 Dept: 50
| 
   RAMON MARTINEZ,                         Plaintiff,             vs. CESAR MARTINEZ, et
  al.,                         Defendants.  | 
  
   Case No.:  | 
  
     24STCV23545  | 
 
| 
   Hearing Date:  | 
  January 27, 2025  | 
 |
| 
   Hearing
  Time:    2:00 p.m.  [TENTATIVE]
  ORDER RE: DEMURRER BY
  DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED COMPLAINT  | 
 ||
Background
On September 12, 2024, Plaintiff Ramon Martinez (“Plaintiff”) filed
this action against Defendants Cesar Martinez, Laura Martinez, and Ricardo
Sanchez. The Complaint alleges causes of action for (1) quiet title, (2)
cancellation of instrument, (3) cancellation of instrument, 
(4)
cancellation of instrument, (5) declaratory relief, and (6) elder abuse.  
            Cesar Martinez, Laura Martinez, and
Ricardo Martinez (collectively, “Defendants”) now demur to each of the causes
of action of the Complaint. Plaintiff opposes.  
Discussion 
As an initial matter,
Defendants’ counsel’s declaration in support of the demurrer provides, inter
alia, that “[a]ttached as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference is a true
and correct copy of my meet and confer to Plaintiff’s counsel, sent via email
to John Bazan, the attorney for Plaintiff Ramon Martinez. This letter outlines
the deficiencies in the Complaint. To
date I have not received a response
from Plaintiff’s counsel. No resolution was reached regarding the deficiencies
in Plaintiff’s complaint and the instant motion has become necessary.” (Hoffman
Decl., ¶ 2.) The Court notes that Defendants’ counsel’s declaration does not
demonstrate that the parties met and conferred in person, by telephone, or by
video conference, or that Defendants’ counsel attempted to do so. 
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section
430.41, subdivision (a), “[b]efore filing a
demurrer pursuant to this chapter, the demurring party shall meet and
confer in person, by telephone, or by video conference with the
party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of
determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the
objections to be raised in the demurrer.” (Emphasis added.) Such
meeting and conferring must be done in good faith with an effort to try to resolve
the issues subject to the demurrer. 
In light of the foregoing,
the hearing on Defendants’ demurrer
is continued to _______________,
2025 at 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 50.  
Defendants are ordered to meet¿and confer¿with Plaintiff within 10 days
of the date of this order.¿If the parties are unable to resolve the pleading
issues¿or if the parties are otherwise unable to meet and confer in good faith,
Defendants are to¿thereafter¿file and serve¿a declaration setting forth the
efforts to meet and confer in compliance with¿Code of Civil
Procedure section 430.41, subdivision (a)(3) within 15 days of this order.¿
Defendants are ordered to give notice of
this order. 
DATED:  January 27, 2025                            ________________________________
Hon. Teresa A.
Beaudet
Judge, Los
Angeles Superior Court