Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: BC572581, Date: 2025-01-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC572581 Hearing Date: January 16, 2025 Dept: 50
|
INTELLIGENT SCM, LLC, dba AMERICAN WORLDWIDE AGENCIES, Plaintiff, vs. RUSSELL W. ROTEN, et al.
Defendants. |
Case No.: |
BC572581 |
|
Hearing Date: |
January 16, 2025 |
|
|
Hearing Time: |
2:00 p.m. |
|
|
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS
RUSSELL W. ROTEN AND DUANE MORRIS LLP’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION |
||
|
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS |
|
|
The motion for summary
judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication brought by Defendants
Russell W. Roten and Duane Morris LLP (jointly, “Defendants”) is continued as set forth below.
Defendants have interposed
28 evidentiary objections. Due to the voluminous number of objections,
the hearing on the motion will be continued to a date that will be set at the
Hearing on Objections discussed below.
The Court orders the parties to meet and confer by
telephone or in person in a serious and good faith effort to resolve and
eliminate the objections. The only objections that should remain are those that
pertain to material evidence regarding material
issues. Keeping the rules of evidence in mind, the parties should be able to
reduce the objections to just a few. If any material objections
remain unresolved, the parties are to set them forth in a joint statement with
the text, the objection, and the argument of each side in favor of their
respective positions regarding the remaining material objections, along with a
space for a ruling.
The joint statement must be filed on or before _______ with a courtesy copy
delivered to Department 50. The Court will review any remaining
objections with the parties at a hearing on _______________ at 2:00 p.m.
(the “Hearing on Objections”). The date for the hearing on the motion will be
set at the Hearing on Objections.
If necessary, based upon the resolutions reached during the
meet and confer process and/or at the Hearing on Objections, the parties may
respectively file and serve revised briefing and evidence. The revised evidence
may eliminate objectionable material; however, no new evidence or new
argument is to be submitted unless it is as a result of compromises reached
during the meet and confer process. In the event that revised briefing
and evidence is necessary, the Court will discuss with the parties a briefing schedule
for the revised briefing at the Hearing on Objections.
Defendants are ordered to give notice of this Order.
DATED: January 16, 2025 ________________________________
Hon. Teresa A.
Beaudet
Judge, Los
Angeles Superior Court