Judge: Teresa A. Beaudet, Case: BC695541, Date: 2022-09-01 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC695541 Hearing Date: September 1, 2022 Dept: 50
| 
   YULIANA
  VALDOVINOS,                         Plaintiff,             vs. ADIR INTERNATIONAL, LLC dba LA CURACAO, et al.,                          Defendants.  | 
  
   Case No.:  | 
  
     BC695541  | 
 
| 
   Hearing Date:  | 
  September 1, 2022  | 
 |
| 
   Hearing Time:  | 
  
   2:00 p.m.  | 
 |
| 
   [TENTATIVE]
  ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS ADIR INTERNATIONAL, LLC dba CURACAO and ERIC VITAL RUBIO’S
  MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION  | 
 ||
            
The motion for summary adjudication brought by
Defendants Adir International, LLC dba Curacao and Eric Vital Rubio (jointly, “Defendants”)
is continued as set forth below. 
            Plaintiff Yuliana
Valdovinos has interposed more than 60 evidentiary objections. Due to the voluminous number of objections, the hearing on the
motion will be continued to a date that will be set at the Hearing on
Objections discussed below. 
The
Court orders the parties to meet and confer by telephone or in person in a
serious and good faith effort to resolve and eliminate the objections. The only
objections that should remain are those that pertain to material evidence regarding material issues. Keeping the rules of evidence in mind, the
parties should be able to reduce the objections to just a few. If any material objections remain
unresolved, the parties are to set them forth in a joint statement with the
text, the objection, and the argument of each side in favor of their respective
positions regarding the remaining material objections, along with a space for a
ruling.
The joint
statement must be filed on or before _______________ with
a courtesy copy delivered to Department 50. The Court
will
review any remaining objections with the parties at a hearing on _______________ at 2:00 p.m. (the
“Hearing on Objections”). The date for the hearing on the motion will be set at
the Hearing on Objections.
If necessary, based upon the resolutions
reached during the meet and confer process and/or at the Hearing on Objections,
the parties may respectively file and serve revised briefing and evidence. The
revised evidence may eliminate objectionable material; however, no new evidence or new argument is to be
submitted unless it is as a result of compromises reached during the meet and
confer process. In the event that revised briefing and evidence is
necessary, the Court will discuss with the parties a briefing schedule for the
revised briefing at the Hearing on Objections. 
In addition, the Court notes that Defendants
filed a “Notice of Lodgment of Evidence in Support of Defendants Adir
International, LLC dba Curacao and Eric Vital Rubio’s Motion for Summary
Adjudication.” The Exhibits referenced in the Notice of Lodgment were not
attached. The Court orders Defendants to file the Notice of Lodgment with the
subject Exhibits attached.  
Defendants are ordered to give notice of this
Order. 
            
DATED:  
________________________________
Hon.
Teresa A. Beaudet
Judge,
Los Angeles Superior Court