Judge: Theresa M. Traber, Case: 19STCV16203, Date: 2023-05-19 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 19STCV16203    Hearing Date: January 3, 2024    Dept: 47

Tentative Ruling

 

Judge Theresa M. Traber, Department 47

 

 

HEARING DATE:     January 3, 2024                     JUDGMENT: July 28, 2023

                                                          

CASE:                         Colin McClintock v. Henry George Brennan et al.

 

CASE NO.:                 19STCV16203 Consolidated with 20STCV01975

           

 

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL (x2)

 

MOVING PARTY:               Attorneys Reed T. Aljian and Justin Daily of Daily Aljian LLP.; counsel for Defendants George and Lisa Brennan

 

RESPONDING PARTY(S): No response on eCourt as of 12/29/23

 

CASE HISTORY:

 

STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS:

           

            Plaintiff alleged that Defendants engaged in elder abuse by inducing Plaintiff’s father to make Defendant the sole beneficiary of a $200,000 life insurance policy.  Judgment was entered on July 28, 2023.

 

            Attorneys Reed T. Aljian and Justin Daily of Daily Aljian LLP move to be relieved as counsel for Defendants George and Lisa Brennan.

 

TENTATIVE RULING:

 

Attorneys Reed T. Aljian and Justin Daily of Daily Aljian LLP move to be relieved as counsel for Defendants George and Lisa Brennan.

 

Moving counsel filed all three required forms (MC-051, -052, and -053) separately as to both Defendants and included a proof of service as required by California Rules of Court rule 3.1362(d).  Moving counsel’s declaration states that they served Defendants by personal service. (MC-052 ¶ 3.)

 

In general, an attorney may withdraw with or without cause so long as the withdrawal would not result in undue prejudice to the client’s interest – i.e., counsel cannot withdraw at a critical point in the litigation, because that would prejudice client, but can withdraw otherwise. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal. App. 4th 904, 915.) The court has discretion to deny an attorney’s request to withdraw where the withdrawal would work an injustice or cause undue delay in the proceeding, but the court’s discretion in this area is one to be exercised reasonably. (Mandell v. Superior Court (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 1, 4.)   

 

Here, trial in this matter has already concluded and judgment entered (See MC-052 ¶ 4.) Defendant Lisa Brennan served a notice of appeal from the judgment. (MC-052 ¶ 7.) The risk of any prejudice to Defendants is therefore low. Moving Counsel’s declaration states grounds for withdrawal exist under Rule of Professional Conduct 1.16(b)(4) (the client renders it unreasonably difficult for the lawyer to carry out the representation effectively) and (b)(5) (breach of a material term of the agreement). (Cal. R. Prof. Conduct 1.16(b)(4)-(5); MC-052 ¶ 2.) In light of the evidence of the breakdown in the relationship and the low risk of prejudice since the trial has concluded, the Court finds that these circumstances warrant withdrawal.

 

Accordingly, Attorneys Reed T. Aljian and Justin Daily of Daily Aljian LLP’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Henry George Brennan is GRANTED.

 

Accordingly, Attorneys Reed T. Aljian and Justin Daily of Daily Aljian LLP’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Lisa Brennan is GRANTED.

 

            This ruling is conditioned on Moving Counsel serving written notice of this order on all parties and filing proof of service with the Court.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 

Dated:  January 3, 2024                                  ___________________________________

                                                                                    Theresa M. Traber

                                                                                    Judge of the Superior Court

 


            Any party may submit on the tentative ruling by contacting the courtroom via email at Smcdept47@lacourt.org by no later than 4:00 p.m. the day before the hearing. All interested parties must be copied on the email. It should be noted that if you submit on a tentative ruling the court will still conduct a hearing if any party appears. By submitting on the tentative you have, in essence, waived your right to be present at the hearing, and you should be aware that the court may not adopt the tentative, and may issue an order which modifies the tentative ruling in whole or in part.