Judge: Theresa M. Traber, Case: 22STCP01973, Date: 2022-07-26 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCP01973 Hearing Date: July 26, 2022 Dept: 47
Tentative Ruling
Judge Theresa M. Traber, Department 47
HEARING DATE: July 26, 2022 TRIAL DATE: NOT
SET
CASE: Maya Steel Fabrications, Inc. v. Rene
Reyes et al.
CASE NO.: 22STCP01973
PETITION FOR RELEASE OF PROPERTY FROM LIEN [CIV. CODE § 8490]
MOVING PARTY: Petitioner Maya Steel Fabrications, Inc.
RESPONDING PARTY(S): No opposition on
eCourt as of July 26, 2022.
PROOF
OF SERVICE:
CASE
HISTORY:
·
05/24/22: Petition filed.
STATEMENT
OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS:
In its Petition filed on May 24, 2022, Petitioner alleges
it owns real property in West Hollywood. Respondents Rene Reyes and East and
West Plumbing, Inc. claim a mechanic’s lien on the property. Respondents have
refused to execute a release of mechanics lien and failed to bring an action to
enforce the lien within 90 days after the recordation of the claim of
lien.
Petitioner seeks an order releasing the mechanic’s lien.
TENTATIVE RULING:
The Petition for Release of
Mechanic’s Lien is CONTINUED to August 29, 2022. Petitioners must re-serve
Respondents by either personal service or by certified or registered mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Petitioners are to file the proof of
service (and any necessary accompanying documents, in the case of service by
certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested) no
later than August 22, 2022.
DISCUSSION:
Petition To Release Lien
(a) On the filing of a petition for a
release order, the clerk shall set a hearing date. The date shall be not
more than 30 days after the filing of the petition. The court may continue the
hearing only on a showing of good cause, but in any event the court shall rule
and make any necessary orders on the petition not later than 60 days after
the filing of the petition.
(b) The petitioner shall serve a copy
of the petition and a notice of hearing on the claimant at least 15 days before
the hearing. Service shall be made in the same manner as service of summons,
or by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested,[1]
addressed to the claimant as provided in Section 8108.
(c) Notwithstanding Section 8116, when
service is made by mail, service is complete on the fifth day following deposit
of the petition and notice in the mail.
(Civ. Code § 8486, bold emphasis and underlining added.)
Here, the petition was filed on May 24, 2022. The hearing
was not calendared until July 26, 2022. The hearing was therefore not set until
more than 60 days after filing of the petition, not within 30 days as required
by Civil Code § 8486(a). Further, Petitioner’s proof of service of the Notice
of Hearing states that Respondent Reyes was served by “substituted service” by
leaving the papers with a UPS Store mailbox clerk named Ashley Martinez, and
that Respondent East and West was served by leaving the papers with the
receptionist for a “Premier Workspaces.” Service of the papers therefore
appears defective.
Accordingly, the Petition for Release of Mechanic’s Lien is
CONTINUED to August 29, 2022. Petitioners must re-serve Respondents by either
personal service, substituted service or other method for serving summons and
complaint, or by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested. Petitioners are to file the proof of service (and any necessary
accompanying documents, in the case of service by certified or registered mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested) no later than August 22, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 26, 2022 ___________________________________
Theresa
M. Traber
Judge
of the Superior Court
Any party may submit on the
tentative ruling by contacting the courtroom via email at Smcdept47@lacourt.org by no later than 4:00 p.m. the day
before the hearing. All interested parties must be copied on the email. It
should be noted that if you submit on a tentative ruling the court will still
conduct a hearing if any party appears. By submitting on the tentative you
have, in essence, waived your right to be present at the hearing, and you should
be aware that the court may not adopt the tentative, and may issue an order
which modifies the tentative ruling in whole or in part.
[1] Civil Code § 8485(c) introduces some uncertainty whether
simply mailing is sufficient. However, because the Legislature specified that a
return receipt must be requested, the Court concludes that service by mail must
include a signed return receipt to be valid. Otherwise, the Legislature would
simply have specified that service by mail without any proof of delivery was
sufficient.