Judge: Theresa M. Traber, Case: 23STCV07876, Date: 2023-08-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV07876 Hearing Date: August 14, 2023 Dept: 47
Tentative Ruling
Judge Theresa M. Traber, Department 47
HEARING DATE: August 14, 2023 TRIAL
DATE: NOT SET
CASE: Norma Aguilar v. Seaside Dining Group, Inc.
CASE NO.: 23STCV07876 ![]()
MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
![]()
MOVING PARTY: Attorney Ramin R. Younessi,
counsel for Plaintiff Norma Aguilar
RESPONDING PARTY(S): No response on
eCourt as of 8/9/23
CASE
HISTORY:
·
04/27/23: Complaint filed.
STATEMENT
OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS:
This is an employment discrimination action. Plaintiff
alleges that Defendant wrongfully terminated her for requesting accommodations
to care for her daughter’s medical needs.
Plaintiff’s
counsel, Ramin R. Younessi, moves the court for an order permitting the
attorney to be relieved as attorney of record in this action.
TENTATIVE RULING:
Attorney Ramin
R. Younessi’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED. This ruling
is conditioned on Moving Counsel giving written notice of the Court’s ruling
and filing a proof of service to that effect.
DISCUSSION:
Plaintiff’s counsel, Ramin R. Younessi, moves the court for
an order permitting the attorney to be relieved as attorney of record in this
action.
Moving counsel filed all three required forms (MC-051,
-052, and -053) and included a proof of service as required by California Rules
of Court rule 3.1362(d). Moving counsel’s
declaration states that he served Plaintiff by mail and confirmed the address is
current by conversation. (MC-052 ¶ 3.)
In general, an attorney may withdraw with
or without cause as long as the withdrawal would not result in undue prejudice
to the client’s interest – i.e., counsel cannot withdraw at a critical point in
the litigation, because that would prejudice client, but can withdraw
otherwise. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal. App. 4th 904,
915.) The court has discretion to deny an attorney’s request to withdraw where
the withdrawal would work an injustice or cause undue delay in the proceeding,
but the court’s discretion in this area is one to be exercised reasonably. (Mandell
v. Superior Court (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 1, 4.)
Here, the matter is not yet set for trial,
and the only hearing on calendar in this matter is the Trial
Setting Conference set for August 14, 2023 at 9:00 AM. (MC-052 ¶¶ 4(b); 6; see
also July 21, 2023 Notice Re: Continuance of Hearing and Order.) Moving Counsel’s
declaration states that he is no longer able to represent Plaintiff due to a
breakdown in the attorney-client relationship.
(MC-052 ¶ 2.) As trial is not yet set and, indeed, the Complaint has not
yet been answered, the Court finds that the risk of prejudice to Plaintiff is
low, and that these circumstances warrant withdrawal.
CONCLUSION:
Accordingly, Attorney Ramin R. Younessi’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel
is GRANTED. This ruling is conditioned on Moving Counsel giving written notice
of the Court’s ruling and filing a proof of service to that effect.
Moving
Party to give notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 14,
2023 ___________________________________
Theresa
M. Traber
Judge
of the Superior Court
Any party may submit on the
tentative ruling by contacting the courtroom via email at Smcdept47@lacourt.org by no later than 4:00 p.m. the day
before the hearing. All interested parties must be copied on the email. It
should be noted that if you submit on a tentative ruling the court will still
conduct a hearing if any party appears. By submitting on the tentative you
have, in essence, waived your right to be present at the hearing, and you
should be aware that the court may not adopt the tentative, and may issue an
order which modifies the tentative ruling in whole or in part.