Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 22STCP03978, Date: 2022-12-13 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCP03978 Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 Dept: 48
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
WENXING ZHANG, Petitioner, vs. ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION
TO COMPEL VERIFIED RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS;
GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PRODUCTION DEMAND AND REQUEST FOR
SANCTIONS Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. December 13, 2022 |
On
November 7, 2022, Petitioner Wenxing Zhang filed a petition to assign a case number
in an uninsured motorist action against Respondent Allstate Northbrook Indemnity
Company.
On
November 17, 2022, Petitioner filed amended motions to compel Respondent’s responses
to Form Interrogatories (Set One) and Production Demand (Set One). Respondent did not file any oppositions.
When
a party fails to serve timely responses to discovery requests, the court may make
an order compelling responses. (Code Civ.
Proc., §§ 2030.290, 2031.300; Healthcare Consulting,
Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 403.) A party that fails to serve timely responses
waives any objections to the request, including ones based on privilege or the protection
of attorney work product. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§§ 2030.290, subd. (a), 2031.300, subd. (a).)
Sanctions shall be imposed against the party who unsuccessfully makes or
opposes a motion to compel, unless the party acted with substantial justification
or the sanction would otherwise be unjust.
(Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (c), 2031.300, subd. (c).)
Petitioner
served discovery on Respondent on August 31, 2022. Respondent did not serve responses to Plaintiff’s
discovery and filed no oppositions to these motions.
Accordingly,
the motions to compel are GRANTED. Within
21 days of this order, Respondent is ordered to serve verified responses, without
objection, to Form Interrogatories (Set One) and Production Demand (Set One).
Each
of the motions include a request for sanctions of $2,015.87. For each motion, counsel billed 3 hours at $300/hour
for drafting the motion, plus 2 hours at $300/hour for reviewing any opposition,
preparing a reply brief, and attending the hearing (total of 5 hours at $300/hour). For each motion, counsel also seeks filing fees
of $515.87 for filing the motions and the original petition to assign a case number.
The
short motions are nearly identical. Respondent
did not file any oppositions, so Petitioner’s counsel is not entitled to attorney
fees anticipatorily billed for the opposition and reply. The motions will be heard together, and the hearings
on the unopposed motions will not be very long.
Petitioner is also not entitled to recover the initial filing fee twice. The Court concludes that a reasonable total sanction
based on a reasonable amount of attorney fees and costs is $1,000.00.
The
requests for sanctions are GRANTED IN PART.
Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company is ordered to pay sanctions of $1,000.00
to Petitioner within 21 days of this order.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit. Parties intending
to appear are encouraged to appear remotely and should be prepared to comply with
Dept. 48’s new requirement that those attending court in person wear a surgical
or N95 or KN95 mask.
Dated this 13th day of December 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior
Court |