Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 22STCV20444, Date: 2025-01-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV20444 Hearing Date: January 27, 2025 Dept: 48
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
RANDALL K. LAHR, Plaintiff, vs. CHRISTINA LINEHAN, et al., Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. January 27, 2025 |
On June 22, 2022, Plaintiff Randall K. Lahr filed this
action against Defendants Christina Linehan and Dan Madonia. On December 26, 2024, Plaintiff filed this request
for entry of default judgment.
As a preliminary matter, the Court’s docket does not
contain an entry of default by the clerk.
Plaintiff must file a revised CIV-100 that corrects the errors identified
in the many Notices of Rejection Default/Clerk’s Judgment.
Plaintiff seeks a judgment of $52,585.00, consisting
of $52,000.00 in damages and $585.00
in costs.
“‘Plaintiffs in a default judgment proceeding must prove
they are entitled to the damages claimed.’
[Citation].” (Kim v. Westmoore
Partners, Inc. (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 267, 288.) “[T]he plaintiff must affirmatively establish
his entitlement to the specific judgment requested.” (Id. at p. 287.)
The only evidence in support of Plaintiff’s $52,000.00
in damages is Plaintiff’s declaration that he “has suffered $52,000.00 in damages
to make necessary repairs to remove all alterations and make neglected repairs”
due to Defendants’ breach of contract. The
Court requires additional evidence of these damages before entering the judgment.
The request for entry of default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
An Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Failure to Enter
Default Judgment is scheduled for April 28, 2025 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 48 at
Stanley Mosk Courthouse.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit. If all parties
in the case submit on the tentative ruling, no appearances before the Court are
required unless a companion hearing (for example, a Case Management Conference)
is also on calendar.
Dated this 27th day of January 2025
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior
Court |