Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 22STCV21340, Date: 2023-08-31 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV21340 Hearing Date: August 31, 2023 Dept: 48
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
OLIVIA JIMENEZ, Plaintiff, vs. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR CONTEMPT Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. August 31, 2023 |
On
November 3, 2022, the Court granted Defendant Subaru of America, Inc.’s motion to
compel Plaintiff Olivia Jimenez’s deposition.
The Court also ordered Plaintiff to pay sanctions of $1,260.00 within ten
days. Plaintiff did not timely pay the sanctions,
despite Defendant’s further reminders. (See
Rynerson Decl. ¶¶ 3-5.)
On
July 28, 2023, Defendant filed a motion for contempt and sanctions due to Plaintiff’s
failure to comply with the November 3, 2022.
A
court may find a person in contempt for disobedience of a lawful court order. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1209, subd. (a)(6), 1218.) “ ‘The elements of proof necessary to support
punishment for contempt are: (1) a valid court order, (2) the alleged contemnor’s
knowledge of the order, and (3) noncompliance.
[Citation.] The order must be clear,
specific, and unequivocal. [Citation.]’ ” (Koshak v. Malek (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th
1540, 1548-1549 (Koshak).) Contempt
“ ‘is a drastic remedy, to be employed only when necessary to the proper and orderly
conduct of judicial proceedings.’ ” (Chapman
v. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1968) 261 Cal.App.2d 194, 201.)
Plaintiff’s
counsel explains that he did not appear at the November 3, 2022 hearing, was unaware
of the sanctions order, and was not copied on Defendant’s email reminders. (Matera Decl. ¶¶ 3-5.) Due to his mistake, inadvertence, and/or excusable
neglect, counsel did not learn about the unpaid sanctions until Defendant filed
this motion. (Matera Decl. ¶¶ 6, 8.) Plaintiff then paid the sanctions. (Matera Decl. ¶¶ 9-10 & Ex. 1.) This was not willful noncompliance with the
Court’s order. Furthermore, this Court has
never found a party or attorney in contempt as a result of a discovery dispute.
The
motion for contempt is DENIED.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit. If all parties
in the case submit on the tentative ruling, no appearances before the Court are
required unless a companion hearing (for example, a Case Management Conference)
is also on calendar.
Dated this 31st day of August 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior
Court |