Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 22STCV23427, Date: 2022-12-08 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV23427 Hearing Date: December 8, 2022 Dept: 48
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
MONTANA MARKETING & SALES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. TONYA THOMAS, Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. December 8, 2022 |
On July 20, 2022, Plaintiff Montana
Marketing & Sales, Inc. dba AAA Green Builders filed this action against Defendant
Tonya Thomas for breach of contract and foreclosure of mechanic’s lien.
On
September 13, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel arbitration and stay the
action pending completion of arbitration.
Defendant did not file an opposition.
When
seeking to compel arbitration, the moving party must allege the existence of an
agreement to arbitrate. (Condee v. Longwood
Management Corp. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 215, 219 (Condee).) The burden then shifts to the opponent to prove
the falsity of the agreement. (Ibid.) After the Court determines that an agreement to
arbitrate exists, it then considers objections to its enforceability. (Ibid.) The Court must grant a petition to compel arbitration
unless the movant has waived the right to compel arbitration or if there are grounds
to revoke the arbitration agreement. (Ibid.;
Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2.)
Plaintiff
provides a copy of the parties’ Home Improvement Contract. (Motion Ex. A.) At the bottom of the first page, there is a box
stating: “ARBITRATION [¶] OWNER: Initial this box if you agree to arbitration. Review the ‘Arbitration of Disputes’ section attached.” (Motion, Ex. A at p. 1.) Defendant initialed in the box. A few pages later is a page titled “ARBITRATION
OF DISPUTES.” (Motion, Ex. A at p. 4 [“Arbitration
Agreement”].) It provides for binding arbitration
“[i]n the event of any dispute, or a claim arising out of or relating to this agreement,
or the enforcement or interpretation hereof.”
It also states, “NOTICE: BY INITIALING IN THE SPACE BELOW, YOU ARE AGREEING
TO HAVE ANY DISPUTE . . . DECIDED BY NEUTRAL ARBITRATION AS PROVIDED BY CALIFORNIA
LAW, AND YOU ARE GIVING UP ANY RIGHTS YOU MIGHT POSSESS TO HAVE THE DISPUTE LITIGATED
IN A COURT OR JURY TRIAL. . . .” Defendant
initialed after “I AGREE TO THE ARBITRATION.”
She also signed a Customer Acknowledgment at the bottom of the page, indicating
that she acknowledged receipt of certain documents or notices, including the Notice
of Arbitration.
Plaintiff
has met its burden of showing the existence of an Arbitration Agreement. (Conde, supra, 88 Cal.App.4th at p. 219.) Defendant did not file an opposition, so she has
not shown any grounds for rescinding the Arbitration Agreement or denying the motion. (See ibid.; Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2.)
The
motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED.
The entire action is STAYED pending the arbitration. A Status Conference re: Arbitration is scheduled
for 12/07/2023 at 8:30 AM in Department 48 at Stanley Mosk Courthouse (December
7, 2023). Five court days before, the parties
are to file a joint report stating the name of their retained arbitrator and the
status of arbitration.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit. Parties intending
to appear are encouraged to appear remotely and should be prepared to comply with
Dept. 48’s new requirement that those attending court in person wear a surgical
or N95 or KN95 mask.
Dated this 8th day of December 2022
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior
Court |