Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 22STCV34516, Date: 2023-03-30 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV34516 Hearing Date: March 30, 2023 Dept: 48
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
OTONIEL MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, vs. PEVIK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. March 30, 2023 |
On October 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed this
action against Defendant, along with a Notice of Related Case. Plaintiff did not file a Notice of Related Case
in Case No. 22STLC05904, in violation of California Rules of Court, rule 3.300(d).
On May 4, 2022, Plaintiff moved
to consolidate the two actions.
“When
actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court,
it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the
actions; it may order all the actions consolidated and it may make such orders concerning
proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 1048, subd. (a).) The purpose of consolidation is to enhance trial
court efficiency by avoiding unnecessary duplication of evidence and the danger
of inconsistent adjudications. (See Todd-Stenberg v. Dalkon Shield Claimants
Trust (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 976, 978-979.)
The
motion for consolidation is procedurally deficient. Under Los Angeles Superior Court Rule 3.3, subdivision
(g), “[c]ases may not be consolidated unless they are in the same department. A motion to consolidate two or more cases may
be noticed and heard after the cases, initially filed in different departments,
have been related into a single department, or if the cases were already assigned
to that department.” Case No. 22STLC05904
is assigned to Department 26, but this action is in Department 48.
Additionally,
a Notice of Motion containing a list of all named parties in each case, the names
of those who have appeared, and the names of their respective attorneys of record
must be filed in each case sought to be consolidated. (California Rules of Court, rule 3.350(a)(1).) No Notice of Motion was filed in Case No. 22STLC05904.
The
motion to consolidate is DENIED without prejudice.
Plaintiff
is ORDERED to immediately file and serve a Notice of Related Case in Case No. 22STLC05904.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit. Parties intending
to appear are encouraged to appear remotely and should be prepared to comply with
Dept. 48’s new requirement that those attending court in person wear a surgical
or N95 or KN95 mask.
Dated this 30th day of March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior
Court |