Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 24STCV10554, Date: 2025-05-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCV10554 Hearing Date: May 23, 2025 Dept: 48
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
ROLEBOT, INC., Plaintiff, vs. MCKINSEY CMO GROUP, Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. May 23, 2025 |
On April 26, 2024, Plaintiff Rolebot Inc. filed this
action against Defendant McKinsey CMO Group.
The Court entered default against Defendant on December 11, 2024. The same day, Plaintiff filed a request for entry
of default judgment. On March 7, 2025, Plaintiff
filed a proposed judgment.
Plaintiff seeks a judgment of $63,189.00, consisting
of $51,450.00 in damages, $6,174.00 in prejudgment interest, $565.00 in
costs, and $5,000.00 in attorney fees.
“‘Plaintiffs in a default judgment proceeding must prove
they are entitled to the damages claimed.’
[Citation].” (Kim v. Westmoore
Partners, Inc. (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 267, 288.) “[T]he plaintiff must affirmatively establish
his entitlement to the specific judgment requested.” (Id. at p. 287.)
Plaintiff does not provide an authenticated copy of the
contract or other evidence of its damages.
There is no declaration from anyone at Plaintiff to authenticate the
contract or to attest to damages. Instead,
Plaintiff provides only a declaration from counsel that lists the amounts sought.
Plaintiff does not include the required prejudgment interest
calculations. (See California Rules of Court,
rule 3.1800(a)(3).)
Plaintiff also does not provide evidence for his $5,000.00
in attorney fees. Counsel’s declaration states
only that they are “attorneys’ fees as specified in contracts.” (Ishimatsu Decl. ¶ 5.) According to the copy of the contract attached
to the complaint, “Customer shall pay Rolebot’s costs of collection including, but
not limited to all outside attorneys’ fees.”
(Complaint, Ex. A, ¶ 2.2.) However,
there is no evidence from which the Court can determine whether the requested amount
of fees is reasonable.
The request for entry of default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
The Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Failure to
Enter Default Judgment is CONTINUED to August 22, 2025 at 8:30 a.m.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit. If all parties
in the case submit on the tentative ruling, no appearances before the Court are
required unless a companion hearing (for example, a Case Management Conference)
is also on calendar.
Dated this 23rd day of May 2025
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior
Court |