Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 24STCV14146, Date: 2025-03-11 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24STCV14146    Hearing Date: March 11, 2025    Dept: 48

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

On June 6, 2024, Plaintiff People of the State of California filed this action against Defendants AA Gonzalez Inc., Alberto A. Gonzalez Sr., and Abel Gonzalez Jr.

On February 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint (“FAC”).

The Court may, in its discretion and after notice to the adverse party, allow an amendment to any pleading.  (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1).)  A motion to amend a pleading must include a copy of the proposed amendment or amended pleading which must be serially numbered to differentiate it from previous pleadings or amendments and must state what allegations in the previous pleading are proposed to be deleted or added, if any, and where, by page, paragraph, and line number, the allegations are located.  (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1324(a).)  The motion shall also be accompanied by a declaration attesting to the effect of the amendment, why the amendment is necessary and proper, when the facts giving rise to the amended allegations were discovered, and why the request for amendment was not made earlier.  (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1324(b).)

Plaintiff identifies all amendments in the Notice of Motion and also provides a redlined copy of the proposed FAC showing all amendments.  (Kirakosian Decl., Ex. 2.)  Plaintiff explains that it has learned that there is no Albert Abel Gonzalez Jr., and that there are two different people in the same family (Abel Gonzalez Jr. and Albert Gonzalez Jr.), one of whom is not connected to the business (Abel Gonzalez Jr.).  (Kirakosian Decl. ¶ 6.)  Plaintiff will amend where Albert Gonzalez Jr.’s name included a middle name and change the case caption.  (Kirakosian Decl. ¶ 6.)  Plaintiff has also learned that the events alleged in the original complaint caused additional damage.  (See Kirakosian Decl. ¶ 7.)  The proposed amendments do not enlarge the scope of this case, and no oppositions were filed.

Because there is no showing of prejudice, the motion for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED.  Plaintiff is ordered to file and serve the FAC within ten days.

Moving party to give notice.

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit.  If all parties in the case submit on the tentative ruling, no appearances before the Court are required unless a companion hearing (for example, a Case Management Conference) is also on calendar.

         Dated this 11th day of March 2025