Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 25STCV02841, Date: 2025-05-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 25STCV02841 Hearing Date: May 27, 2025 Dept: 48
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. GENERAL MOTORS LLC, Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. May 27, 2025 |
On February 3, 2025, Plaintiff
Lorenzo Luis Luna filed this Song-Beverly action against Defendant General Motors
LLC.
On
April 29, 2025, Defendant filed a motion for protective order. Defendant requests entry of a protective order
based on the Model Los Angeles County Superior Court Confidential Protective Order. (See Gale Decl., Ex. 5.) Defendant argues that is policies and procedures
for handling warranty claims and repurchase requests by California consumers are
proprietary and confidential. (Motion at
p. 6.)
Plaintiff
argues that the motion “is not supported by any document-specific showing of harm
or legal necessity,” and “[i]t merely asserts, in conclusory fashion, that some
materials are confidential— without tying those claims to any statutory or factual
foundation.” (Opposition at p. 3.) According to Plaintiff, Defendant “seeks to impose
broad confidentiality restrictions on routine corporate documents that are subject
to mandatory disclosure under Code of Civil Procedure section 871.26.” (Id. at p. 4.)
A
protective order does not relieve Defendant of its discovery obligations and the
new mandatory disclosures under Code of Civil Procedure section 871.26. Rather, it permits the parties to designate as
“Confidential” any documents, testimony or information that the designating party
in good faith believes to contain non-public information that is entitled to confidential
treatment under applicable law. (Protective
Order at p. 2.) This designation process
will facilitate, not hinder, the discovery process by making confidential materials
more easily produced with less need for privacy objections. If a party wants to challenge a “Confidential”
designation, it may do so by noticed motion.
The
motion for protective order is GRANTED. The
Court will sign the proposed order submitted on April 29, 2025.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit. If all parties
in the case submit on the tentative ruling, no appearances before the Court are
required unless a companion hearing (for example, a Case Management Conference)
is also on calendar.
Dated this 27th day of May 2025
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior
Court |