Judge: Thomas D. Long, Case: 25STCV04378, Date: 2025-05-15 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 25STCV04378 Hearing Date: May 15, 2025 Dept: 48
SUPERIOR
COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
MICHAEL FINE, Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT HULL, Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER
FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE Dept. 48 8:30 a.m. May 15, 2025 |
On February 19, 2025, Plaintiff
Michael Fine filed this action against Defendant Robert Hull.
On
April 22, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for order for alternative service. Plaintiff seeks an order permitting service by
posting a copy of the Summons and Complaint at the entrance of Defendant’s residence
and mailing a copy of the same documents to the same address via certified mail,
return receipt requested.
Plaintiff
provides Declarations of Non-Service from registered process servers. Between February 22, 2025 and March 9, 2025, the
process service made seven attempts at service and was unable to access the address
due to a private gate/fence, although he waited and honked his horn. On March 17, 2025, there was no answer at Defendant’s
residence, and a neighbor said the subject resides there. On March 19, 2025, the process server “spoke with
an individual who identified themselves as the resident and they stated subject
unknown” and “spoke with a neighbor who says not resident.”
Plaintiff
brings this motion pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure sections 413.30
and 415.50. Section 413.30 authorizes the
Court to “direct that summons be served in a manner which is reasonably calculated
to give actual notice to the party,” but that is only “[w]here no provision is made
in this chapter or other law for the service of summons.” Section 415.50 governs service by publication,
which is not requested in this motion.
Plaintiff
has not provided legal authority for service by posting and mailing in this action. Plaintiff also has not shown that Defendant cannot
with reasonable diligence be served in another manner, such as by personal service
at another location or by substituted service.
Accordingly,
the Motion for Order Alternative Service is DENIED.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SMCDEPT48@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit. If all parties
in the case submit on the tentative ruling, no appearances before the Court are
required unless a companion hearing (for example, a Case Management Conference)
is also on calendar.
Dated this 15th day of May 2025
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior
Court |