Judge: Thomas Falls, Case: 22PSCV00456, Date: 2023-04-07 Tentative Ruling
The Court may change tentative rulings at any time. Therefore, attorneys are advised to check this website to determine if any changes or updates have been made to the tentative ruling.
Counsel may submit on the tentative rulings by calling the clerk in Dept. O at 909-802-1126 before 8:30 the morning of the hearing. Submission on the tentative does not bind the court to adopt the tentative ruling at the hearing should the opposing party appear and convince the court of further modification during oral argument.
The Tentative Ruling is not an invitation, nor an opportunity, to file any further documents relative to the hearing in question. No such filing will be considered by the Court in the absence of permission first obtained following ex-parte application therefore.
Case Number: 22PSCV00456 Hearing Date: April 7, 2023 Dept: O
Hearing Date: Friday,
April 7, 2023
RE: GABRIELA CABRERA vs BOST LAND, LLC, A DELAWARE
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
(22PSCV00456)
________________________________________________________________________
(1)
PLAINTIFF
GABRIELA CABRERA’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DEEM ALL REQUESTS FOR
ADMISSION (SET ONE) ADMITTED AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS
(2)
PLAINTIFF
GABRIELA CABRERA’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS
FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS;
(3)
PLAINTIFF
GABRIELA CABRERA’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FORM
INTERROGATORIES; AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
(4)
PLAINTIFF
GABRIELA CABRERA’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL
INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
Responding Party: Unopposed as of Wed. 3-29 at 8AM (due Fri. 3-24)[1]
Tentative Ruling
(1)
PLAINTIFF
GABRIELA CABRERA’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DEEM ALL REQUESTS FOR
ADMISSION (SET ONE) ADMITTED AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS is GRANTED.
(2)
PLAINTIFF
GABRIELA CABRERA’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS
FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS is GRANTED.
(3)
PLAINTIFF
GABRIELA CABRERA’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FORM
INTERROGATORIES; AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS is GRANTED.
(4)
PLAINTIFF
GABRIELA CABRERA’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO SPECIAL
INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS is GRANTED.
Monetary sanctions are imposed on Defendant and its attorney of record,
jointly and severally, in the reduced, total amount of $1,000.
Background
This is an ADA case.
On May 16, 2022,
Plaintiff filed her suit against Defendant Bost Land LLC.
On July 25, 2022,
Defendant filed its Answer.
On February 15, 2023,
Plaintiff filed the instant four (4) motions.[2]
Discussion
On July 11, 2022,
Plaintiff propounded all four discovery requests upon Defendant. On October 14,
2022, Plaintiff’s counsel emailed Defense Counsel informing that discovery
responses had not been received.[3]
To date, no responses have been received.
Therefore, as
responses have not been received, the court orders Defendant to provide the
responses.
As for monetary
sanctions, counsel seeks imposition of monetary sanctions of $800 per motion
($400 hourly rate at two hours/motion). Utilizing a Lodestar approach, and in
view of the totality of the circumstances,[4]
the court finds that the total and reasonable amount of attorney’s fees and
costs incurred for the work performed in connection with the pending motion is
$1,000 [1 hour/motion at $250/hour]. Sanctions are payable within 20 days of
the date of the hearing.
Conclusion
Based on the
foregoing, the motions are granted, and monetary sanctions are imposed in the
reduced, total amount of $1,000 (i.e., not $1,000 per motion but $1,000
for all four motions).
[1] Based on
the attorney information found in the answer, Defense Counsel’s email is pstillman@stillmanassociates.com. And according to Ex. B attached to each motion, the
meet and confer letter was sent to the same email. Lastly, the proof of service
indicates that Defense Counsel was served via mail and electronic mail at the
addresses provided in the Answer. Therefore, Plaintiff has provided adequate
notice of the hearings to Defendant.
[2] The court consolidated the hearings on the motion.
[3] The declaration of Plaintiff’s Counsel provides the
email. It is unclear whether Defense Counsel responded to the email because the
motions merely state that no responses have been received.
[4] Circumstances are that the motions are short, does not
contain a legal analysis, are identical in substance, aside from the statutory
authority per discovery type.