Judge: Upinder S. Kalra, Case: 21STCV07255, Date: 2023-01-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV07255 Hearing Date: January 20, 2023 Dept: 51
Judge Upinder S.
Kalra, Department 51
HEARING DATE: January
20, 2023
CASE NAME: Thomas A. Chesney, individually, and
derivatively on behalf of TG Automotive, Inc. and Santa Clarita Tire &
Service Inc. v. Gregory Andrew Chesney, et al.
CASE NO.: 21STCV07255
![]()
MOTION
TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
![]()
MOVING PARTY: Defendant’s Counsel Adam D. H. Grant
RESPONDING PARTY(S): None as of January 17, 2023
REQUESTED RELIEF:
1.
An order
Granting Attorney’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Gregory
Andrew Chesney
TENTATIVE RULING:
1. Motion
to be Relieved as Counsel is GRANTED.
STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS:
On February 24, 2021, Thomas A . Chesney ("Plaintiff'),
individually and derivatively on behalf of TG Automotive, Inc. and Santa
Clarita Tire & Service Inc. (collectively, the "Corporations")
filed this action against his brother and business partner, Gregory Andrew
Chesney ("Defendant"). This is an action by a director and
shareholder of the Corporations to recover corporate assets misappropriated by
Defendant.
On April 4, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel
Deposition, which was GRANTED, in part.
On July 15, 2022, Defendant filed an Answer.
The current Motion to be Relieved as Counsel was filed on
December 15, 2022. An ex parte application was filed December 19, 2022, to
shorten and advance the hearing as to this matter, which was GRANTED. No
Opposition has been filed as of January 17, 2023.
LEGAL STANDARD:
The court may order that an attorney be
changed or substituted at any time before or after judgment or final
determination upon request by either client or attorney and after notice from
one to the other. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 284, subd.
(b).) An attorney is permitted to withdraw where conflicts between the
attorney and client make it unreasonable to continue the representation.
(See Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-700(C)(1).) “The determination whether
to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel lies within the sound
discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi
& Levine v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128,
1133.)
An application to be relieved as counsel
must be made on Judicial Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion)
(Cal. Rules of Court 3.1362(a)), MC-052 (Declaration) (Cal. Rules of Court
3.1362(c)), and MC-053 (Proposed Order) (Cal. Rules of Court
3.1362(e)).
Further,
the requisite forms must be served on the client and all other parties who have
appeared in the case. (Cal. Rules of Court 3.1362(d).) The court
may delay effective date of the order relieving counsel until proof of service
of a copy of the signed order on the client has been filed with the
court. (Cal. Rules of Court 3.1362(e).)
ANALYSIS:
Adam D.H.
Grant moves to be relieved as counsel for Defendant Gregory Andrew Chesney. The
Declaration in Support of Attorneys’ Motion states that there has been a total
breakdown in communication between client and counsel. This breakdown has
prevented counsel from effectively representing Defendant.
Counsel has
provided all the required documents under California Rules of Court Rule
3.1362. The Proof of Service filed concurrently indicates that both Plaintiff’s
counsel and Defendant Chesney have been served, via email and mail.
Conclusion:
For
the foregoing reasons, the Court decides the pending motion as follows:
Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is
GRANTED effective upon filing proof of service of this order on Defendant.
Moving party is to give notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January
20, 2023 _________________________________ Upinder
S. Kalra
Judge
of the Superior Court