Judge: Upinder S. Kalra, Case: 23STCV28292, Date: 2025-01-16 Tentative Ruling
1. If you wish to submit on the tentative ruling, please email the clerk at SMCdept51@lacourt.org (and “cc” all other parties in the same email) and notify all other parties in advance that you will not be appearing at the hearing. Include the word "SUBMISSION" in all caps in the subject line and include your name, contact information, the case number, and the party you represent in the body of the email. If you do not have access to the internet, you may call the clerk at (213) 633-0351.
If you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear and argue the motion, and the Court may decide not to adopt the tentative ruling. Please note that the tentative ruling is not an invitation, nor an opportunity, to file any further documents relative to the hearing in question which are not authorized by statute or Rule of Court.
2. For any motion where no parties submit to the tentative ruling in advance, and no parties appear at the motion hearing, the Court may elect to either adopt the tentative ruling or take the motion off calendar, in its discretion.
3. DO NOT USE THE ABOVE EMAIL FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO SUBMIT TO A TENTATIVE RULING. The Court will not read or respond to emails sent to this address for any other purpose.
Case Number: 23STCV28292 Hearing Date: January 16, 2025 Dept: 51
Tentative Ruling
Judge Upinder S.
Kalra, Department 51
HEARING DATE: January
16, 2025
CASE NAME: Bianca
Martinez v. Cube World USA Inc., et al.
CASE NO.: 23STCV28292
![]()
MOTIONS
TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL![]()
MOVING PARTY: Adli
Law Group P.C.
RESPONDING PARTY(S): None as of January 10, 2025
REQUESTED RELIEF:
1. An
Order Relieving Adli Law Group P.C. as Counsel for Defendants Cube World USA
Inc., Cube World USA LLC, and Kevin Maxwell.
TENTATIVE RULING:
1. Motions
to be Relieved as Counsel are CONTINUED to January 29, 2025 at 9:00 a.m.
STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS:
On November 17, 2023, Plaintiff Bianca Martinez (Plaintiff)
filed a Complaint against Defendants Cube World USA Inc., Cube World USA, LLC,
and Kevin Maxwell (Defendants) with eight causes of action for: (1) Sexual
Harassment; (2) Failure to Prevent Harassment; (3) Assault; (4) Sexual Battery;
(5) Retaliation / Wrongful Constructive Termination; (6) Constructive Discharge
in Violation of Public Policy; (7) Failure to Provide Accurate Wage Statements;
and (8) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress.
According to the Complaint, Plaintiff worked for Defendants
as an executive assistant where she experienced unwanted, severe, and/or
pervasive sexual harassment. Plaintiff further alleges that due to this conduct
she had not choice but to resign. Plaintiff also alleges labor law violations.
On March 18, 2024, Defendants filed an Answer.
On September 19, 2024, Counsel Adli filed the instant
Motions to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendants Cube World USA Inc., Cube
World USA LLC, and Kevin Maxwell. Oppositions were due on or before January 3,
2025. As of January 10, 2025, the court has not received any opposition.
LEGAL STANDARD:
The court may order that an attorney be changed or
substituted at any time before or after judgment or final determination upon
request by either client or attorney and after notice from one to the other.¿¿
(Code of Civ. Proc., § 284,¿subd. (b).)¿ An attorney is permitted to withdraw
where conflicts between the attorney and client make it unreasonable to
continue the representation.¿ (See Cal. Rules of Prof. Conduct 3-700(C)(1).)¿
“The determination whether to grant or deny a motion to withdraw as counsel
lies within the sound discretion of the trial court.” (Manfredi & Levine v. Superior Court¿(1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 1128,
1133.)¿¿¿¿
¿¿
An application to be relieved as counsel must be made on
Judicial Counsel Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion) (Cal. Rules of Court
3.1362(a)), MC-052 (Declaration) (Cal. Rules of Court 3.1362(c)), and MC-053
(Proposed Order) (Cal. Rules of Court 3.1362(e)).¿¿¿¿
¿¿
Further, the requisite forms must be served on the client
and all other parties who have appeared in the case.¿ (Cal. Rules of Court
3.1362(d).)¿ The court may delay effective date of the order relieving counsel
until proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the client has been
filed with the court.¿ (Cal. Rules of Court 3.1362(e).)¿¿
ANALYSIS:
Counsel indicates that irreconcilable differences have
arisen with each Client making it unreasonably difficult to carry out the
representation. Counsel indicates that Defendants were each personally served
with the motions. However, there is no proof of service on file with the court.
Accordingly, the court CONTINUES the motions to be
relieved as counsel to allow Counsel the opportunity to file adequate proof of
service.
CONCLUSION:
For
the foregoing reasons, the court decides the pending motion as follows:
1. Motions
to be Relieved as Counsel are CONTINUED to January 29, 2025 at 9:00 a.m.
Moving party is to give notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 16, 2025 __________________________________ Upinder
S. Kalra
Judge
of the Superior Court