Judge: Virginia Keeny, Case: 19VECV01307, Date: 2022-09-02 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19VECV01307 Hearing Date: September 2, 2022 Dept: W
ELIZABETH HARANDI V. LINDA HOUSE, ET AL.
MOTION
TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
Date
of Hearing: September 2, 2022 Trial Date: November 28, 2022
Department:
W Case No.: 19VECV01307
Moving Party: Kurt Zimmerman, Counsel of record
for Defendant Galindo & Fox, a partnership
Responding
Party: None
Notice: Proper
BACKGROUND
This
is a professional malpractice action. Plaintiff alleges that she hired
Defendants Linda House, Law Offices of Galindo & Fox, A Professional
Corporation, Galindo and Fox, a partnership and Marcia Galindo to represent
Plaintiff in a Dissolution of Marriage. Plaintiff alleges that over the course
of the representation, Defendants committed a multitude of negligent acts
including: failing to file a "Keech Declaration " which caused
Plaintiff's motion to be ineligible for attorney's fees, failing to respond as
to how to report Plaintiff's income to the court which caused the court to make
inaccurate and detrimental decision concerning Plaintiff's finances, failing to
inform Plaintiff with required promptness of developments in her case, among
many other alleged negligent acts.
Defendant
Marcia Galindo passed away on August 1, 2021. Plaintiff discovered that
Defendant Jessica Thomas was the Trustee of Defendant Marcia Galindo’s
Trust. On March 28, 2022, Jessica Thomas
was substituted in as Defendant as Beneficiary of Defendant Galindo’s Trust, as
Successor-in-Interest.
Plaintiff filed a complaint on September 12, 2019, alleging:
1)
Professional Malpractice
2)
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
3)
Breach of Contract
On
August 5, 2022, Kurt Zimmerman (“Counsel”) filed the instant motion to be
relieved as counsel for Defendant Galindo & Fox, a partnership. Defendant
does not oppose.
[TENTATIVE]
RULING: GRANT
DISCUSSION
Counsel
seeks to be relieved on the grounds Defendant Marcia Galindo died in 2021.
Prior to Galindo’s death, Counsel attests that the partnership which she was
associated with, Defendant Galindo & Fox, a partnership, had suspended
operations. Counsel attests that he does not represent any estate or potential
successors-in-interest to any Defendants. In addition, Counsel attest that he
suffers from a medical condition making his continued representation
impossible.
Counsel
has complied with the requirements of CRC Rule 3.1362 by filing forms MC-051
and MC-052 and lodging with the Court a copy of the proposed order on form
MC-053 as to Defendant. Counsel served Defendant by mail at Defendant’s last
known address. Counsel also served all other parties who have appeared in the
case via mail.
Further,
it appears no prejudice will be suffered by Defendant.
Accordingly,
the Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Galindo & Fox, a
partnership is GRANTED.