Judge: Virginia Keeny, Case: 21VECV01021, Date: 2023-01-31 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 21VECV01021    Hearing Date: January 31, 2023    Dept: W

MEADOW RIVER INVESTMENTS, LLC v. TAMJIDI ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.

 

plaintiff meadow river investments, llc’s motion for attorney fees and costs

 

Date of Hearing:        January 31, 2023                   Trial Date:       N/A   

Department:              W                                            Case No.:        21VECV01021

 

Moving Party:            Plaintiff Meadow River Investments, LLC    

Responding Party:     No opposition

 

BACKGROUND

 

On August 2, 2021, Plaintiff Meadow River Investments, LLC filed a complaint against Defendants Tamjidi Enterprises, Inc., Shahram Tamjidi, and Douglas C. Moore asserting causes of action for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, promissory estoppel, and judicial foreclosure.

 

Plaintiff alleges Defendant Tamjidi Enterprises, Inc. applied for a commercial credit loan with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Defendant Tamjidi personally agreed to repay the loan plus interest. Plaintiff further alleges Defendant Moore personally agreed to repay the loan plus interest. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association sold all rights, title and interest it had in the Loan to Cadlerock IV, L.L.C. Thereafter, the loan was assigned from Cadlerock IV, L.L.C. to Plaintiff Meadow River Investments, LLC. Prior to the assignment, Defendants had stopped making payments in June 2020. As a result, Plaintiffs allege Defendants are in default and material breach of the Loan and Commercial Guaranty #1 and Commercial Guaranty #2 for failure to pay amounts upon demand and default interest is accruing.

 

On December 9, 2022, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was granted. Judgment has not yet been entered.

 

[Tentative] Ruling

 

Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Plaintiff Meadow River Investments, LLC moves the court for an order awarding reasonable attorney fees and costs under the terms of the written contract at issue. Plaintiff moves for recovery of attorney fees and costs pursuant to CRC § 3.1702 and Code of Civil Procedure section 1717.

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 1021 provides that “[e]xcept as attorney's fees are specifically provided for by statute, the measure and mode of compensation of attorneys and counselors at law is left to the agreement, express or implied, of the parties; but parties to actions or proceedings are entitled to their costs, as hereinafter provided.”  Code of Civil Procedure section 1032(b) states that “a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding.”  Further, Code of Civil Procedure section 1033.5(a)(10) provides that costs can include attorney’s fees when authorized by contract, statute, or law.

 

Civil Code section 1717(a) states “[i]n any action on a contract, where the contract specifically provides that attorney’s fees and costs, which are incurred to enforce that contract, shall be awarded either to one of the parties or to the prevailing party, then the party who is determined to be the party prevailing on the contract, whether he or she is the party specified in the contract or not, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees in addition to other costs.” Additionally, under Civil Code section 1717(b), the prevailing party on a contract will be the party who recovered a greater relief in the action on the contract, but “[w]here an action has been voluntarily dismissed or dismissed pursuant to a settlement of the case, there shall be no prevailing party for purposes of this section.”  (Civ. Code §1717(b)(1)-(2).)  

 

Prevailing Party

 

Plaintiff is the prevailing party for purposes of costs. As noted above, reasonable attorney fees are “allowable costs” when authorized by contract, statute, or law. CCP § 1033.5(a)(10). This court ordered summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff’s breach of contract claims. The contract provides that the guarantors (Shahram Tamjidi, and Douglas C. Moore) guarantee to pay all of the lender’s (Wells Fargo) costs, expenses and attorney fees incurred in connection with or relating to the collection and enforcement of the indebtedness and borrower’s (Tamjidi Enterprises, Inc.) obligations under the agreement. (Mot.Exh. 4, p. 4.)

 

Reasonableness

 

The moving party bears the burden of proof on any claim not based upon the court's established attorney fee schedule. (CCP §1033.5(c)(5).)

 

The court considers the declaration by attorney Sayyar and the attached billing entries. Plaintiff requests $13,247.50 in attorney fees and $1,483.64 in costs. Plaintiff seeks $13,247.50 for 75.7 hours of work at counsel’s hourly rate of $175.00. Plaintiff’s counsel has been practicing law since 2008 and has extensive experience in filing lawsuits to collect unpaid notes and litigating said matters from start to finish. (Sayyar Decl. ¶¶4-5.) The court finds Plaintiff’s counsel’s hourly rate reasonable.

 

Moreover, the court finds the hours expended reasonable. Counsel attests the 75.7 hours include communication with the client contact, reviewing the case file, drafting, editing, and finalizing the complaint and summons and related initial filing documents, arranging for service of process, filing proofs of service with the court, attempting to settle the case, preparing for and attending the case management conference, sending written discovery to the Defendants, responding to their written discovery, engaging in third party discovery subpoenas, preparing, drafting, and filing the motion for summary judgment and/or in the alternative, motion for summary adjudication, drafting replies to Defendants opposition to the motion for summary judgment, attending the court ordered MSC post hearing, preparing post summary judgment orders and the memorandum of costs and this motion for fees and costs. (Sayyar Decl. ¶6.) Counsel provides their billing entries detail as Exhibit 2.

 

As for Plaintiff’s costs, the court finds Plaintiff’s costs reasonable as well. Plaintiff seeks $995.00 in filing and motion fees; $315.85 in service of process; $172.79 for fees for electronic filing or service.

 

Accordingly, the court grants Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees in the amount of $13,247.50 and $1,483.64 in costs.