Judge: Virginia Keeny, Case: 22STCV30217, Date: 2025-02-13 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV30217 Hearing Date: February 13, 2025 Dept: 45
AIR TIGER EXPRESS (USA), INC. V. CHAO-TEN HUANG, ET AL.
MOTION
TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE
Date
of Hearing: February 13, 2025 Trial
Date: None set.
Department:
45 Case
No: 22STCV30217
Moving Party:
Attorney David C. Temes
Responding
Party: None.
Notice: Proper
FACTUAL
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff
Air Tiger Express (USA), Inc., (“Plaintiff”) filed this misappropriation of
trade secrets case against Defendants on September 15, 2022.
On
January 6, 2025, New York attorney David C. Temes (“Temes”), through
Plaintiff’s counsel of record Andrew M. Purdy of Brown, Neri, Smith & Khan,
LLP, filed this motion to be admitted pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff. No
opposition has been filed. Plaintiff filed a reply stating that no opposition
had been filed on February 5, 2025.
TENTATIVE
RULING:
GRANT
Temes
filed this motion pursuant to Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 9.40. Rule 9.40 states
that an applicant’s application “must” state (1) the applicant’s residence and office
address; (2) the courts to which the applicant has been admitted to practice
and the dates of admission; (3) that the applicant is a licensee in good
standing in those courts; (4) that the applicant is not currently suspended or
disbarred in any court; (5) the title of each court and cause in which the
applicant has filed an application to appear as counsel pro hac vice in
this state in the preceding two years, the date of each application, and
whether or not it was granted; and (6) the name, address, and telephone number
of the active licensees of the State Bar of California who are the attorneys of
record for the case. (See Cal. Rules of Court Rule 9.40(d).)
Temes’
declaration contains all of the information required by Rule 9.40(d) and is
unopposed. The Court grants his application.
Accordingly,
the Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED.