Judge: Virginia Keeny, Case: 22VECV01347, Date: 2023-04-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22VECV01347 Hearing Date: April 28, 2023 Dept: W
DEFAULT
JUDGMENT
|
Case No. |
22VECV01347 |
|
Case Name: |
Mty
Franchising USA, Inc. v. Trimurti Management, Inc. |
|
Defaulting Defendant(s): |
Trimurti Management, Inc. |
|
Hearing
Date: |
March 16, 2023 |
Amount:
Damages: $
Interest: $
Attorney Fees: $
Costs: $
Total: $
This is an unlawful detainer action. On September 13, 2022,
Plaintiff filed the UD action against Defendant. Judgment for possession ahs
been entered.
TENTATIVE
RULING: DENY
The JUD-100 form and CIV-100 form do not match the UD-116
form. The JUD-100 and CIV-100 form seeks $105,150.20 in damages; $10,515.02 in interest; $24,566.00 in attorney
fees; and $2,690.72 in costs. The UD-116 form seeks a money judgment totaling $222,122.02.
The court notes the complaint requests past due rent of $105,150.20 only.
The CCP 585 declaration is not by Plaintiff.
The declaration must be under penalty of perjury by one with personal
knowledge, establishing liability and damages. A declaration of an attorney
with no firsthand knowledge of the facts is insufficient.
Plaintiff also requests attorney fees in excess of the
amount provided in Local Rule 3.214. Plaintiff
has not demonstrated the work provided in obtaining the default should exceed
the Local Rule amount. Moreover, Plaintiff seeks $2,690.72 in costs. This
number is extremely high. Plaintiff must provide evidence for the costs sought.