Judge: Virginia Keeny, Case: 23VECV01035, Date: 2023-04-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23VECV01035 Hearing Date: April 28, 2023 Dept: W
SHARON
ZALEWSKI v. CHRISTOPHER OLIVER
demurrer to the complaint
Date of Hearing: April
28, 2023 Trial
Date: None
set.
Department: W Case
No.: 23VECV01035
Moving Party: Defendant
Christopher Oliver
Responding Party: No
opposition
BACKGROUND
This is an unlawful detainer action.
Plaintiff Sharon Zalewski alleged they served a 3-Day Notice to Quit on
Defendant Christopher Oliver.
[Tentative] Ruling
Defendant Christopher Oliver’s Demurrer
to the Complaint is OVERRULED.
DISCUSSION
Defendant Christopher Oliver demurs to
the unlawful detainer complaint on the grounds the unlawful detainer complaint
fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because the “3
Day notice is improper” and the Plaintiff accepted a $3,000.00 Cashier's check.
A demurrer can be used only to
challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack; or from
matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v.
Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal 3d 311, 318.)
No other extrinsic evidence can be considered (i.e., no “speaking
demurrers”).
Defendant Oliver first demurs to the
complaint on the grounds the 3-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit does not provide
the phone number of the entity to whom rent is to be paid, as required by Code
of Civil Procedure section 1161(2). The 3-Day Notice, which is attached to the
complaint, includes Plaintiff’s information.
Defendant also demurs to the complaint
on the grounds Plaintiff lacks standing. However, the complaint states
Plaintiff is the owner of the property. As is well known, in a demurrer, all
facts alleged in the complaint are assumed to be true, so Defendants contention
that Plaintiff lacks standing without more is not enough to sustain a demurrer.
Defendant did not seek judicial notice of the official County records Defendant
refers to or the purported payment of rent.
Accordingly, Defendant’s demurrer is
OVERRULED.