Judge: Walter P. Schwarm, Case: 30-2017-00962787, Date: 2022-09-20 Tentative Ruling

Motion No. 1:

 

Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to Melissa Cicello (Motion), filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 244, is GRANTED.

 

The Motion complies with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362 (a), (c), and (d).  Moving Counsel has shown proof of personal service on Melissa Cicello of the required documents. (Proof of Personal Service filed on 9-14-22 under ROA No. 324.)  Moving Counsel also provided notice of the 9-20-22 hearing. (Notice of Ruling filed on 9-8-22 under ROA No. 314.)

 

The declaration filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 236 states in part, “There has been a significant breakdown in the attorney-client relationship which has significantly impeded counsel’s ability to effectively prosecute this case and represent client’s interests. . . .” This declaration is sufficient to justify withdrawal under Professional Conduct Rule, 1.16, subdivision (b)(4).

 

Moving Counsel will remain as counsel of record until Moving Counsel files proof of service of the court’s signed order on Melissa Cicello.

 

Based on the above, the court GRANTS Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to Melissa Cicello filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 244.

 

Moving Counsel is to give notice.

 

Motion No. 2:

 

Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to Complete Medical Management, Inc. (Motion), filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 246, is GRANTED.

 

The Motion complies with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362 (a), (c), and (d).  Moving Counsel has shown proof of personal service on Complete Medical Management, Inc. of the required documents. (Proof of Personal Service filed on 9-14-22 under ROA No. 322.)  Moving Counsel also provided notice of the 9-20-22 hearing. (Notice of Ruling filed on 9-8-22 under ROA No. 314.)

 

The declaration filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 242 states in part, “There has been a significant breakdown in the attorney-client relationship which has significantly impeded counsel’s ability to effectively prosecute this case and represent client’s interests. . . .”  This declaration is sufficient to justify withdrawal under Professional Conduct Rule, 1.16, subdivision (b)(4). 

 

Moving Counsel will remain as counsel of record until Moving Counsel files proof of service of the court’s signed order on Complete Medical Management, Inc.

 

Based on the above, the court GRANTS Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to Complete Medical Management, Inc. filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 246.

 

Moving Counsel is to give notice.

 

Motion No. 3:

 

Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to William R. Edwards, D.C. (Motion), filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 248, is GRANTED.

 

The Motion complies with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362 (a), (c), and (d).  Moving Counsel has shown proof of personal service on William R. Edwards, D.C. of the required documents. (Proof of Personal Service filed on 9-14-22 under ROA No. 318.)  Moving Counsel also provided notice of the 9-20-22 hearing. (Notice of Ruling filed on 9-8-22 under ROA No. 314.)

 

The declaration filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 240 states in part, “There has been a significant breakdown in the attorney-client relationship which has significantly impeded counsel’s ability to effectively prosecute this case and represent client’s interests. . . .”  This declaration is sufficient to justify withdrawal under Professional Conduct Rule, 1.16, subdivision (b)(4).

 

Moving Counsel will remain as counsel of record until Moving Counsel files proof of service of the court’s signed order on William R. Edwards, D.C.

 

Based on the above, the court GRANTS Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) ) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to William R. Edwards, D.C. filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 248.

 

Moving Counsel is to give notice.

 

Motion No. 4:

 

Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to Traci Edwards (Motion), filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 250, is GRANTED.

 

The Motion complies with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362 (a), (c), and (d).  Moving Counsel has shown proof of personal service on Traci Edwards of the required documents. (Proof of Personal Service filed on 9-14-22 under ROA No. 316.)  Moving Counsel also provided notice of the 9-20-22 hearing. (Notice of Ruling filed on 9-8-22 under ROA No. 314.)

 

The declaration filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 238 states in part, “There has been a significant breakdown in the attorney-client relationship which has significantly impeded counsel’s ability to effectively prosecute this case and represent client’s interests. . . .”

 

Moving Counsel will remain as counsel of record until Moving Counsel files proof of service of the court’s signed order on Traci Edwards.  This declaration is sufficient to justify withdrawal under Professional Conduct Rule, 1.16, subdivision (b)(4).

 

Based on the above, the court GRANTS Moving Counsel’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to Traci Edwards filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 250.

 

Moving Counsel is to give notice.

 

Motion No. 5:

 

Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to Lien Solutions, LLC (Motion), filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 252, is GRANTED.

 

The Motion complies with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362 (a), (c), and (d).  Moving Counsel has shown proof of personal service on Lien Solutions, LLC of the required documents. (Proof of Personal Service filed on 9-14-22 under ROA No. 320.)  Moving Counsel also provided notice of the 9-20-22 hearing. (Notice of Ruling filed on 9-8-22 under ROA No. 314.)

 

The declaration filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 234 states in part, “There has been a significant breakdown in the attorney-client relationship which has significantly impeded counsel’s ability to effectively prosecute this case and represent client’s interests. . . .”  This declaration is sufficient to justify withdrawal under Professional Conduct Rule, 1.16, subdivision (b)(4).

 

Moving Counsel will remain as counsel of record until Moving Counsel files proof of service of the court’s signed order on Lien Solutions, LLC.

 

Based on the above, the court GRANTS Moving Counsel’s (Brown & Charbeneau) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel directed to Lien Solutions, LLC filed on 7-21-22 under ROA No. 252.

 

Moving Counsel is to give notice.