Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 18STCV00643, Date: 2022-08-22 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 18STCV00643 Hearing Date: August 22, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
On October 9,
2018, Plaintiff Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club (“Plaintiff”)
filed this subrogation action against Defendants Nery Estib Rodriguez Merida
(“Nery”), Erick L. Meria (“Erick L.”), and Erick A. Merida (“Erick A.”)
(collectively “Defendants”).
Default was
entered against Defendant Nery on April 3, 2019. On April 6, 2021, after striking the answers
filed by Defendants Erick A. and Erick L., default was entered against Erick A.
and Erick L.
On July 13,
2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s application for default judgment against
Defendant Nery without prejudice. The
Court found the application did not include sufficient evidence to support the
amount of damages sought and Plaintiff failed to explain why a several judgment
solely against Defendant Nery was appropriate when Erick L. and Erick A.
remained parties to this case.
At this time,
Plaintiff seeks default judgment against Defendants in the amount of $75,785.00,
consisting of $75,000.00 in uninsured motorist benefits and $785.00 in
costs. With respect to the judgment
against Erick L. and Erick A., the registered owners of the vehicle involved in
the collision, the proposed default judgment specifies that the judgment is
limited by Vehicle Code section 17151(a) to a total of $15,785.00, consisting
of $15,000.00 in uninsured motorist benefits and $785.00 in costs.
The Court
finds Plaintiff has submitted sufficient evidence to support the claim.
Accordingly,
Plaintiff’s request for entry of default judgment filed on July 28, 2022 is
GRANTED.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.