Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 19STCV05450, Date: 2022-10-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV05450 Hearing Date: October 20, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
Plaintiff(s), vs. LOS
ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF LEONCIO SIA; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. October
20, 2022 |
On February 4, 2019, plaintiff
Margarito Garcia (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendant Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“Defendant”) arising from an
automobile collision that occurred on or about April 11, 2018.
On September 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed
this motion to compel the deposition of Defendant’s purported employee, Leoncio
Sia (“Sia”). Plaintiff also requested
monetary sanctions in the amount of $3,500.
On October 13, 2022, Defendant filed an
opposition brief arguing that the motion was improper because: (1) the
deposition was already scheduled for October 26, 2022, and (2) Sia is not a
current employee of Defendant.
“The service of a deposition notice . .
. is effective to require any deponent who is a party to the action or an
officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party to attend and to
testify, as well as to produce any document, electronically stored information,
or tangible thing for inspection and copying.”
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.280, subd. (a).) Former employees are not required to attend a
deposition unless subpoenaed. (Maldonado
v. Superior Court (2002) 94 Cal.App.4th 1390.)
Plaintiff did not file a reply brief responding
to Defendant’s argument that an order compelling Sia’s attendance was required
or that Defendant should be sanctioned even if the deposition has been
scheduled. Defense counsel has also
declared that he was unable to communicate with Sia regarding the scheduling
for his deposition until September 19, 2022, when Sia advised him that he had
retired from his employment with Defendant in 2020. (Wyatt Decl., ¶ 4.)
In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff’s
motion is DENIED. Plaintiff’s request
for sanctions is also DENIED.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.