Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 19STCV24372, Date: 2022-08-30 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 19STCV24372 Hearing Date: August 30, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. PRESTON
COLE, LLC, et al., Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. August
30, 2022 |
On July 10,
2019, Plaintiff Richard Corvera (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against
Defendants Preston Cole, LLC, Socal Biofuel, Inc., and Does 1 to 100 for
negligence and premises liability arising from an incident that occurred on or
about July 23, 2017. Plaintiff alleges he
was riding his motorcycle through a parking lot area in University Plaza when
his motorcycle slipped on a large grease spill on the asphalt and fell
sideways, crashing onto the asphalt and causing harm to Plaintiff. Plaintiff subsequently filed amendments to
complaint, substituting in Westridge Commercial, Inc.; Curry Up; Caitano
Francisco Vaz; Grand Natural, Inc.; One More Time, Inc.; Tacos Gourmet Simply
Fresh, Inc.; and LSW Enterprises, LLC for Does 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10,
respectively.
On June 20,
2022, Plaintiff filed this motion for leave to amend complaint. No opposition has been filed.
The court
may, in its discretion and after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any
terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading, including adding or
striking out the name of any party, or correcting a mistake in the name of a
party, or a mistake in any other respect.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1).)
A motion to amend a pleading must include a copy of the proposed
amendment or amended pleading which must be serially numbered to differentiate
it from previous pleadings or amendments and must state what allegations in the
previous pleading are proposed to be deleted or added, if any, and where, by
page, paragraph, and line number, the allegations are located. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324(a).) The motion shall also be accompanied by a
declaration attesting to the effect of the amendment, why the amendment is
necessary and proper, when the facts giving rise to the amended allegations
were discovered, and why the request for amendment was not made earlier. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324(b).)
Plaintiff
seeks leave to file a First Amended Complaint to add parties and plead specific
facts as to these parties, as well as to correct errors. Plaintiff provides that the deposition of the
person most knowledgeable for Southern California Biofuel was taken on December
3, 2021 and that Preston Cole LLC and Westridge Commercial Inc. hired Southern
California Biofuel, One More Time, Inc. and Grand Natural, Inc. to pick up the
used cooking grease and clean out the grease traps for all the restaurants
located at the University Plaza. Plaintiff
explains he is seeking leave to add the specific restaurant owners at the
University Plaza at the time of the incident and facts upon which they
contribute to the neglected overflow of the grease storage containers and
exacerbated the spillage to overflow into the parking lot areas. Plaintiff also seeks to correct the address
number for the University Plaza where the incident took place. Plaintiff explains that amendment to the
complaint was not sought until now because Plaintiff was further investigating
the added Doe defendants.
Plaintiff has
complied with CRC Rule 3.1324. Further,
allowing Plaintiff to file the proposed FAC would be in furtherance of justice
and would not prejudice defendants. No
opposition has been filed contending otherwise.
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s
motion for leave to amend complaint is GRANTED.
Plaintiff is ordered to file the First
Amended Complaint within 5 days of the date of this order.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.