Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 20STCV24719, Date: 2022-08-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV24719 Hearing Date: August 4, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. LOS
ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al., Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR
ADMISSION, SET 3; REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. August
4, 2022 |
On June 30, 2020, plaintiff Joshua
Payton (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendants Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“Defendant”) and Geneva Smith arising
from an automobile accident that occurred on December 8, 2019. On May 25, 2022, Defendant served Requests
for Admission (Set Three) (“RFAs”) on Plaintiff. No responses were received.
Defendant seeks an order compelling
Plaintiff to provide responses to the RFAs.
Defendant cites to CCP 2033.280(a) as authority for this motion. However, this Code provision only states that
a party who fails to serve a timely response waives any objections to the
request, including those based on privilege or work product protection. The rest of the provision provides a party
with the ability to move for an order deeming admitted the genuineness of any
documents and the truth of any matters specified in the requests for
admission. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280,
subd. (b)-(c). The only other motion
permitted regarding requests for admissions is a motion for an order compelling
a further response if an answer to a particular request is insufficient or an
objection is without merit. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 2033.290.)
The Court therefore lacks the authority
to grant the requested order to compel responses. Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing
and argue the matter. Unless you receive
a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that
others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.