Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 20STCV25110, Date: 2022-12-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV25110 Hearing Date: December 28, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
JENNIFER
ERICSON, Plaintiff, vs. STEVEN FURWA; DANIEL FURWA; Does 1 to 100, Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT STEVEN FURWA’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. December
28, 2022 |
On July 2,
2020, Jennifer Ericson (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against
Jo-Steven Furwa (“Defendant”) and Daniel
Furwa for injuries arising out of a motor
vehicle accident. Defendant
filed this unopposed motion to continue trial on December 5, 2022.
Trial
is currently set for February 2, 2023.
Continue
Trial
Rule of Court 3.1332 authorizes a trial
continuance on an affirmative showing of good cause. Pursuant to Rule 3.1332(d), in ruling on an
application or motion for continuance, the court must consider “[t]he proximity
of the trial date; [w]hether there was any previous continuance, extension of
time, or delay of trial due to any party; [t]he length of the continuance
requested; . . . [t]he prejudice that parties or witnesses will suffer as a
result of the continuance; . . . [w]hether all parties have stipulated to a
continuance; [w]hether interests of justice are best served by a continuance;
and [a]ny other relevant facts.”
Here, nearly all of
Plaintiff’s medical treatment has been through the Veterans Health
Administration (“VA”). (Motion, Lascola
Decl. ¶ 4.) Through her counsel,
Plaintiff authorized the VA to release her medical records to Defendant, but
the VA has not yet produced these records.
(Motion, Lascola Decl. ¶ 4.) Without
the production of her records from the VA, the taking of Plaintiff’s deposition
has been delayed because these records constitute such a significant part of
the evidence in this litigation.
(Motion, Lascola Decl. ¶ 5.) Expert
witness discovery for both Plaintiff and Defendant is incomplete, due to the
inability to finalize the necessary percipient discovery in a timely manner. (Motion, Lascola Decl. ¶ 6.) A trial continuance will allow for the
appropriate completion of expert witness discovery. (Motion, Lascola Decl. ¶ 6.) There have been two prior trial continuances. (Motion, Lascola Decl. ¶ 9.) Defendant seeks a continuance of
approximately 120 days (or 4 months). (Motion,
Lascola Decl. ¶ 10.) A stipulation was
also filed on December 9, 2022, showing that the parties have agreed to a trial
continuance.
Accordingly, Defendant’s unopposed motion
to continue trial is GRANTED. As the
requested trial date of June 8, 2023 is not available, trial is continued from
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing
and argue the matter. Unless you receive
a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that
others might appear at the hearing to argue.
If the Court does not receive emails from the parties indicating
submission on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the
hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the tentative as the final
order or place the motion off calendar.