Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 20STCV31776, Date: 2022-10-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV31776 Hearing Date: October 5, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
Plaintiff(s), vs. DLT TRANSPORT, LLC, et al., Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. October 5, 2022 |
PI Hub Courts will not hear a motion to compel
further discovery responses to discovery until the parties have engaged in an Informal
Discovery Conference (“IDC”). The Courts may deny or continue the motion unless
the parties have participated in an IDC before the scheduled hearing. (See
Seventh Amended Standing Order for Procedures in the Personal Injury Hub Courts
(5/16/2022) (the “Order”).) The Court’s file reflects that no IDC has taken
place or even been reserved by Plaintiff.
The parties are required to appear for an IDC
to enable the Court to discuss with the parties their inability to resolve
discovery disputes without Court intervention. The parties may or may not find
this useful, but the Plaintiff here insufficiently considers the need the Court
may have to attempt every effort to obtain resolution of discovery disputes
without the need for an already overly burdened motions calendar to accommodate
an otherwise resolvable dispute.
Moreover, the IDC provides the Court with an
opportunity to weigh the good faith each party has brought to the attempt to
resolve discovery disputes, which may later inform the Court's ruling on a
request for sanctions. The Order clearly states “PI Hub Courts will not hear
Motions to Compel Further Discovery Responses to discovery until the parties
have engaged in an Informal Discovery Conference (IDC).” But, it also alerts
parties that reserving or scheduling an IDC does not extend the time to file a
Motion to Compel further, so the motions need to be timely filed, the IDC date
reserved, and the motion hearing date reserved.
Lest there be any doubt as to the importance
the Court gives to the IDC requirement, the Order states that “[a] party's
failure to stipulate to extend the time to bring [a motion to compel further]
so that an IDC may be held may subject the parties and/or counsel to the
imposition of sanctions.”
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to compel
further discovery responses is DENIED.
Moving
party to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as
directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all other
parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.