Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 20STCV38740, Date: 2022-08-10 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV38740 Hearing Date: August 10, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. CITY
OF ARCADIA, et al., Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
ORDER
RE: EXPEDITED PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF MINOR |
Marc Mendoza
Claimant Marc Mendoza (“Claimant”), a
minor, by and through their parent and guardian ad litem, Jackie Toscano
(“Petitioner”), has agreed to release their claims against Defendant City of
Arcadia in exchange for $5,000. If
approved, $1,250 will be used to pay attorney’s fees, leaving a balance of $3,750
for Claimant, to be paid or delivered to Petitioner.
Court approval is required for all
settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate
Code §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code of Civ. Proc. § 372.) The Court has reviewed the proposed
settlement and finds it to be fair and reasonable. Further, the Court finds the proposed
attorney’s fees, which amount to 25% of the settlement amount, to be fair and
reasonable.
The Court apologizes for erroneously
noting in its previous minute order that Item 6a should be checked on the
proposed order. Instead, as Claimant is
a minor, Item 6b should be checked.
In light of the foregoing, the hearing
on the Expedited Petition to Approve Minor’s Compromise is continued to August 24,
2022, at 1:30 p.m. so that a revised proposed order can be submitted. The revised proposed order should be filed no
later than August 17, 2022.
Hannah
Mendoza
Claimant
Hannah Mendoza (“Claimant”), a minor, by and through their parent and guardian
ad litem, Jackie Toscano (“Petitioner”), has agreed to release their claims
against Defendant City of Arcadia in exchange for $5,000. If approved, $1,250 will be used to pay
attorney’s fees, leaving a balance of $3,750 for Claimant, to be paid or
delivered to Petitioner.
Court
approval is required for all settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate Code §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code of
Civ. Proc. § 372.) The Court has
reviewed the proposed settlement and finds it to be fair and reasonable. Further, the Court finds the proposed
attorney’s fees, which amount to 25% of the settlement amount, to be fair and
reasonable.
The Court apologizes for erroneously
noting in its previous minute order that Item 6a should be checked on the
proposed order. Instead, as Claimant is
a minor, Item 6b should be checked.
In light of the foregoing, the hearing
on the Expedited Petition to Approve Minor’s Compromise is continued to August
24, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. so that a revised proposed order can be submitted. The revised proposed order should be filed no
later than August 17, 2022.