Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 20STCV44141, Date: 2022-12-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV44141 Hearing Date: December 28, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
ALISHA
GARTH, as guardian ad litem for Jayla
Garth, Plaintiffs, vs. MAXIMILLIAN A. HUFF; Does 1-10, Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT MAXIMILLIAN A. HUFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. December
28, 2022 |
On November 17,
2020, Alisha Garth and Jayla Garth (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed
this action against Maximillian
A. Huff (“Defendant”) for
injuries arising from a motor vehicle accident. On December 1, 2022, Defendant filed an ex
parte application to continue trial, which the Court denied. Defendant filed this unopposed motion to
continue trial on December 5, 2022.
Trial
is currently set for January 9, 2023.
Continue
Trial
Rule of Court 3.1332 authorizes a trial
continuance on an affirmative showing of good cause. Pursuant to Rule 3.1332(d), in ruling on an
application or motion for continuance, the court must consider “[t]he proximity
of the trial date; [w]hether there was any previous continuance, extension of
time, or delay of trial due to any party; [t]he length of the continuance
requested; . . . [t]he prejudice that parties or witnesses will suffer as a
result of the continuance; . . . [w]hether all parties have stipulated to a
continuance; [w]hether interests of justice are best served by a continuance;
and [a]ny other relevant facts.”
Here, Defendant is currently serving in
the United States Army and is unavailable for the trial date currently
set. (Motion, Exh. A ¶¶ 3-4.) Both parties stipulated to a continuance,
which is signed by counsel for each.
(Motion, Exh. B.)
Pursuant to Rule 3.1332(d), all of these factors favor a grant of the
continuance. The parties previously
stipulated to two other trial continuances.
(Motion, Varjian Decl. ¶
9.) Defendant requests a continuance to
May 15, 2023. (Motion, Varjian Decl. ¶
13.) Plaintiff’s counsel authorized
service of this motion via email rather than personal service. (Motion, Varjian Decl. ¶ 14.) Pursuant to Rule 3.1332(d), all of these factors favor a
grant of the continuance.
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to continue
trial is GRANTED. Trial is continued from
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.