Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 21STCV08393, Date: 2022-09-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV08393 Hearing Date: September 20, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. LEI
GAO, et al., Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
ORDER
RE: APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT |
|
|
) |
|
On March 3, 2021, plaintiff Victor
Hsieh (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendants Song Mu (“Mu”) and Lei
Gao (“Gao”) for battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional
distress. Plaintiff alleges that on
October 21, 2019, Mu struck Plaintiff with a meat cleaver and caused him to
fall to the ground. (Compl., ¶ 7.) While Plaintiff was on the ground, Mu attempted
to strike him again while Gao struck him in the head multiple times with the
bottom portion of one or more chairs.
(Compl., ¶ 8.) Default was
entered against Mu on April 26, 2021, and against Gao on May 3, 2021. Mu and Gao were subsequently arrested and
pled no contest to violation of Penal Code section 245(a)(4).
Plaintiff requests a default judgment
against Defendants in the amount of $2,199,448.88, consisting of $498,036.16 in
special damages, $234,868.84 in general damages, $732.40 in costs, and
$1,465,811.48 in punitive damages.
Plaintiff’s medical expenses paid by
Medi-Cal amounts to $1,457.19 and Medi-Cal is demanding $1,092.90 in
reimbursement. Plaintiff states his
general damages is derived by multiplying his total past medical charges of
$58,717.21 by 4. However, his medical
expenses are admittedly much less due to Medi-Cal’s payments. Therefore, Plaintiff must revise his stated
medical expenses and any calculation of his general damages derived from that
amount.
Plaintiff also states he has suffered
loss of earnings in the approximate amount of $64,736 to date because he has
been unable to work since he was injured.
He attaches pay stubs showing that from May to October 2019, he was
employed by Corporate eWaste Solutions.
During this time, he earned $13 or $14 an hour and averaged 34 hours per
week. He also claims loss of earning
capacity and states he expects to lose an approximate amount of $432,208, based
on the average lifespan of 77 years for a male residing in the United States in
2020. Plaintiff calculates his future
loss of earnings by multiplying his annual income of $24,752 by 17.5 years. He declares his cognitive and physical abilities
have been impaired by the attack and has been unable to mentally focus on tasks
and has difficulty remembering things.
He states he suffers from ongoing lower back and leg pain and weakness
in his legs and is wheelchair bound, resulting in his inability to maintain
employment as a warehouse worker or any other job requiring physical exertion. He does not have a college degree and does
not believe he will be able to obtain any job in the future which does not
primarily require physical exertion. However,
Plaintiff’s request for loss of future earning capacity is limited to $400,000
based on his statement of damages. (Ex.
10.)
Plaintiff’s request for punitive
damages is DENIED. Plaintiff submits no
proof regarding either defendant’s financial condition and does not show that
the award is not excessive in light of defendants’ ability to pay.
Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s
application for default judgment is DENIED without prejudice.