Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 21STCV10310, Date: 2022-12-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV10310 Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
| ALEXANDER CEDILLO, Plaintiff, vs. TREVOR SIMONS aka TREVOR SIMMONS; LARRY SIMONS; Does 1 to 30, Defendants. | ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. December 29, 2022 |
I. INTRODUCTION
This action arises out of a motor vehicle collision. Plaintiff Alexander Cedillo (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Trevor Simons aka Trevor Simmons and Larry Simons (collectively, “Defendants”) on March 16, 2021. Trial is set for June 14, 2023.
Plaintiff is represented by V&A Law Firm, which filed this motion to be relieved as counsel on November 30, 2022. The motion is accompanied by a declaration, proposed order, and proof of service.
II. LEGAL STANDARD
Code of Civil Procedure section 284 states that an attorney in an action may be changed at any time before or after judgment: (1) upon the consent of both client and attorney; or (2) upon the order of the court, upon the application of either client or attorney, after notice from one to the other. (Code Civ. Proc. § 284; CRC 3.1362.) The court has power to permit withdrawal of an attorney within its sound discretion. (Jones v. Green (1946) 74 Cal.App.2d 223, 229.) An attorney may withdraw without cause as long as the withdrawal can be accomplished without undue prejudice to the client's interest – i.e., counsel cannot withdraw at a critical point, but if the case is not at a critical point withdrawal is permitted because the client will not be prejudiced. (Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915.) The court has discretion to deny the withdrawal request when withdrawal would work an injustice or cause undue delay in proceeding; but the court's discretion in this area is one to be exercised reasonably. (See Mandell v. Superior (1977) 67 Cal.App.3d 1.)
Counsel must make a motion to be relieved as attorney of record. The form and content of such motion are governed by California Rules of Court rule 3.1362. The motion must be made using mandatory forms: Notice of Motion and Motion to be Relieved as Counsel – Civil (MC-051), Declaration (MC-052), and Proposed Order (MC-053). The forms must be filed and served in compliance with the procedural standards set forth in CRC 3.1362.
III. DISCUSSION
When prompted on Item 2 of the form declaration for the reason for the motion, V&A Law Firm explains, “the attorney-client relationship has broken down. The attorney filing this [m]otion would be comfortable detailing in the Court’s chambers, for the Court the breakdown in the relationship between the attorney and [Plaintiff], dating back to last year (2021), the efforts by the attorneys to reach out to [Plaintiff] and make an attempt to resolve these differences.” (Vahdat Decl. ¶ 2.) Other than this paragraph, V&A Law Firm does not attach additional evidence to the declaration or motion. V&A Law Firm served Plaintiff by mail and email. (Proof of Service, p. 2; Motion, Proof of Service, p. 1; Vahdat Decl., Proof of Service, p. 1; Proposed Order, Proof of Service, p. 1.) Trial is 5½ months away, and the case is not at a critical point. Even though V&A Law Firm’s evidence is scant, the Court permits V&A Law Firm’s withdrawal.
IV. CONCLUSION
Accordingly, V&A Law Firm’s motion to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED and effective upon filing a proof of service showing service of this Order on Plaintiff and all parties who have appeared.
V&A Law Firm to give notice of this ruling.
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.