Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 21STCV10383, Date: 2022-12-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV10383 Hearing Date: December 5, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. EDWARD
26 FLORENCE, LLC, Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: PETITION TO APPROVE MINOR’S COMPROMISE Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. December
5, 2022 |
Claimant Matthew Estrada (“Claimant”),
a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Luis Estrada (“Petitioner”), has
agreed to settle his claims against Defendant Edward 26 Florence, LLC and
nonparty Pacific Specialty Insurance Company in exchange for $35,000. If approved, $1,559.07 will be used for
medical expenses, $11,666.67 will be used for attorney’s fees, and $1,413.58
will be used for non-medical expenses, leaving a balance of $20,320.68 for
Claimant to be deposited into a blocked account, subject to withdrawal only
upon authorization of the court.
Court approval is required for all
settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate
Code §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code
Civ. Proc. § 372.) The petition must be
verified and “must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any bearing
on the reasonableness of the compromise, covenant, settlement, or
disposition.” (CRC 7.950.) The Court has reviewed the proposed
settlement and finds that it is fair and reasonable. Further, the requested attorney’s fees, which
amounts to approximately 33% of the total settlement, is fair and reasonable.
However, the petition is
deficient. Item 2 of the Petition
misspells Claimant’s name. Item 3 of the
Petition incorrectly states that the action is pending in Stanley Mosk
Courthouse. Also, no proposed order
approving the compromise on Form MC-351 or proposed order to deposit money on
Form MC-355 are on file. Accordingly,
the hearing on the petition is CONTINUED to January 21, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The revised petition and proposed orders must
be filed no later than January 16, 2022.
The proposed orders should be filed separately.
Per California Rules of Court, Rule
7.952, Petitioner and Claimant must appear at the hearing, unless the Court
finds good cause to excuse their appearance.
The Court finds that Petitioner and Claimant’s appearances are not
necessary, but will require Petitioner’s counsel to appear.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.