Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 21STCV15658, Date: 2022-10-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV15658 Hearing Date: October 28, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
et al., Defendant(s), |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS KABADAYAN TRUST DATED DECEMBER 14, 2006 AND JOSEPH
KABADAYAN’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. October
28, 2022 |
On
April 26, 2021, plaintiff Juan Cardenas (“Plaintiff’) filed this action against
the City of Los Angeles alleging a dangerous condition that caused him to fall
on or around May 28, 2020. On March 31,
2022, Plaintiff added Joseph Kabadayan as Doe 1, Joseph Kabadayan Trust as Doe
2, and Yun Hyo Song as Doe 3.
On
September 16, 2022, Joseph Kabadayan and Kabadayn Trust Dated December 14, 2006
(erroneously sued as Joseph Kabadayn Trust) (“Moving Defendants”) filed this
demurrer arguing that neither of them owns the property or the bakery that is
located on the property.
On
December 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed a non-opposition “response” in which he: (1)
requests leave to name Kermanig, LLC as a defendant and (2) agrees to dismiss
Moving Defendants from this action without prejudice.
No
reply brief from Moving Defendants is on file.
In
light of Plaintiff’s non-opposition and the lack of a reply brief from Moving
Defendants, Moving Defendants’ demurrer is SUSTAINED. Moving Defendants are hereby dismissed from
the action without prejudice.
The Court declines
to rule on Plaintiff’s request to amend the complaint to add Kermanig, LLC at
this time. Plaintiff must make this substitution
in a separate filing.
Moving parties to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.