Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 21STCV27459, Date: 2022-12-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV27459 Hearing Date: December 20, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. RICHARD
LAWRENCE JOYCE, Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR
ADMISSIONS AND FORM INTERROGATORIES; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. December
20, 2022 |
On July 18, 2022, defendant Richard
Lawrence Joyce (“Defendant”) filed these two motions for orders compelling
plaintiff Maria De Lourdes Miranda to provide further responses to Requests for
Admission (Set One) and Form Interrogatories (Set Two). After the informal discovery conference
(“IDC”) held on November 14, 2022, Plaintiff provided verified supplemental
responses on November 29, 2022. Plaintiff
filed an omnibus opposition on December 7, 2022 which included her own request
for monetary sanctions against Defendant for his refusal to take these motions
off calendar unless Plaintiff paid for the costs fees incurred in filing these
motions.
On December 13, 2022, Defendant filed a
reply brief in which he maintains his request for monetary sanctions against Plaintiff
and her attorneys of record, Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court
rule 3.1348, a court may award sanctions under the Discovery Act in favor of a
party who files a motion to compel discovery, even though the requested
discovery was provided to the moving party after the motion was filed. Here, defense counsel attempted to meet and
confer with Plaintiff’s counsel and was willing to grant extensions to further
meet and confer over Plaintiff’s discovery responses in exchange for a
reciprocal extension to the deadline to file any motions to compel
further. Plaintiff’s counsel did not participate
in the meet and confer efforts and essentially forced Defendant to file a
motion to compel further in order to avoid forfeiting his right to do so. It is irrelevant that the IDC was scheduled
after the motions were filed, because the Standing Order only requires that the
IDC occur before the motion to compel further is heard. Had Plaintiff’s counsel been more responsive
to defense counsel’s reasonable requests to discuss Defendant’s discovery
requests, motion practice could have been avoided.
Accordingly, Defendant’s requests for
sanctions is GRANTED and imposed against Plaintiff and counsel of record,
Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1,380,
consisting of 6 hours at defense counsel’s hourly rate of $210, including $120
in filing fees.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.