Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 21STCV30077, Date: 2022-12-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV30077 Hearing Date: December 9, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
Claimants, Kiara Campillo (“Kiara”) and
Jocelyn Campillo (“Jocelyn”), both minors, by and through their Guardian Ad
Litem, Esperanza Ramirez (“Petitioner”), filed these petitions for approval of
their respective settlements with Defendant Michael Anthony Federici (“Defendant”).
Kiara has agreed to settle her claims
against Defendant for $1,100. If
approved, the net settlement amount of $700 after attorney’s fees of $275 and
costs of $125 will be deposited into a blocked account, subject to
withdrawal only upon authorization of the court. Kiara experienced
nervousness and anxiety as a result of the accident and did not receive any
treatment in connection with the incident. She has completely recovered from
her injuries.
Jocelyn has agreed to settle her claims
against Defendant for $5,500. If Jocelyn’s gross settlement is approved, $805
will be distributed to health care providers for medical care; $1,375 for
attorney’s fees and $175 for costs. The balance of $3,144.07 will be
deposited into a blocked account, subject to withdrawal only upon authorization
of the court. As a result of the incident, she suffered neck pain, chest
pain, and left knee injuries. She sought treatment at Adventist Health White
Memorial and Lim Rehabilitation & Chiropractic, Inc. after the accident and
has recovered completely from her injuries.
Court approval is required for all
settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate
Code §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code
Civ. Proc. § 372.) The Court has
reviewed the proposed settlements and finds that both settlements are fair and
reasonable. Further, the requested
attorney’s fees which amounts to approximately 25% of the total settlement for
each Claimant is fair and reasonable.
The two unopposed Petitions to approve
minor’s compromise are GRANTED.
The Court sets an OSC for
________________ for proof of deposits.
(Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 7.953(a).)
If an acknowledgement of receipt by the financial institution is filed
before that date, no appearance will be required.
Per California Rules of Court, Rule
7.952, Petitioner and Claimant must appear at the hearing, unless the Court
finds good cause to excuse their appearance.
The Court finds that Claimant’s appearance is not necessary but will
require Petitioner to appear.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who
intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as
directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.