Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 21STCV37594, Date: 2022-12-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV37594 Hearing Date: December 7, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Anna Vaserfirer; Arkady Vaserfirer,
Plaintiffs vs. Uber Technologies, Inc.; Raiser,
LLC; Rasier-CA, LLC; Avis Rent a Car System LLC; Oscar Moquete; Does 1 to
100, Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO BE
RELIEVED AS COUNSEL Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. December 7, 2022 |
This
action arises out of an alleged collision between a rideshare vehicle driven by
Defendant Oscar Moquete (“Defendant”) and pedestrian Plaintiff Anna
Vaserfirer. The complaint was filed on
October 12, 2021, and trial is set for April 11, 2023. Defendant is represented by Christopher
Filer, Esq. and the law firm Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP. Defendant’s counsel filed this motion to be
relieved as counsel on November 2, 2022, which is accompanied by a declaration,
proposed order, and proof of service.
As
a preliminary matter, the Court notes the filing of a rules-compliant motion,
declaration, proposed order, and proof of service. Christopher Filer, Esq. makes the following
representation in the motion and declaration:
My
office was retained by Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Co. to represent [Defendant’s]
interest in this action, which we have diligently and faithfully done to
date. Since the date of our retention,
coverage has been denied by Blue Hill due to uncovered facts. There has very little contact with the
client, [Defendant], who
continues to fail to contact our office despite numerous follow ups.
(Motion, ¶ 3; Filer Decl., ¶ 2.)
Defendant’s counsel attaches a brief email
conversation from October 6, 2022 in which it appears Defendant has declined an
offer by counsel of retained services in light of the insurer’s denial of
coverage. (Motion, Exh. 1.)
The
Court notes that trial is scheduled for April 11, 2023, and no prejudice will
result from the granting of this motion.
However, the Court CONTINUES the hearing and orders counsel to submit
revised proposed order which includes the client's operational email address
for service purposes. The hearing is continued
to December 14, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. The
revised proposed order should be submitted by December 12, 2022.
Counsel
to give notice of this ruling.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as
directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear
at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and
argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If
the Court does not receive emails from the parties indicating submission on
this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court
may, at its discretion, adopt the tentative as the final order or place the
motion off calendar.