Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 22AHCV00466, Date: 2023-03-03 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22AHCV00466 Hearing Date: March 3, 2023 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – NORTHEAST DISTRICT
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 8:30
a.m. March
6, 2023 |
This lawsuit arises out of
a dispute over real property in Monterey Park (the “Property”). Plaintiff Meng Ma sought to quiet title and
to recover lost rents due to defendant Xiuping Sun’s intentional interference
with Plaintiff’s use of the Property and the collection of rent from the
Property’s tenants.
Previously,
on February 14, 2023, Plaintiff introduced exhibits at a hearing and
established title over the Property as well as her damages. The Court ordered Plaintiff to submit a
proposed default judgment for the Court’s review and consideration. On February 16, 2023, Plaintiff submitted a
proposed judgment for the amount of $35,273.80, consisting of $34,638.80 in
damages and $635 in costs. The proposed
judgment also checks Item 7 and states: “Plaintiff and Liang Sun are the legal
owners of the property commonly known as 425 North Moore Avenue#A [sic],
Monterey Park,CA [sic] 01754. Defendant
Xiuping Sun has no right, title or interest to the property commonly known as
425 North Moore Avenue,#A, [sic] Monterey Park,CA [sic] 91754.”
For
her damages, Plaintiff seeks lost rent in the amount of $31,110 and attorney
costs of $3,458 to remove the illegal tenants that Defendant had rented the
Property to. This is a total of
$34,568.80, not $34,638.80.
The
Court will address the discrepancy with the Plaintiff at the hearing.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this
|
|
|
William A. Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |