Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 22AHCV00668, Date: 2025-04-11 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22AHCV00668 Hearing Date: April 11, 2025 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 8:30
a.m. |
|
|
) |
|
Defendant Dilys Jones (“Defendant”), as
Trustee of the Louis Petrie Separate Property Trust, moves for an order imposing
sanctions against Plaintiff Café on Lemon, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) for failing to
comply with the Court’s orders issued on September 17 and September 18, 2024
(“September Orders”). The September Orders directed Plaintiff to serve
responses and pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $570. The motion is
brought under Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.010(g), which authorizes
monetary sanctions for disobeying a court order to provide discovery.
Defendant argues that additional
sanctions of $1,900 should be imposed for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the
initial amount of $570 imposed by the September Orders.
In opposition, Plaintiff’s counsel
attaches a copy of a check dated October 22, 2024, showing that $1,425 was paid
to defense counsel.
On reply, Defendant argues that the
referenced check does not address the $570 imposed for failing to provide
discovery responses, but a different sanction imposed by the Court on October
16, 2024.
Since there is no evidence that
Plaintiff has complied with the Court’s September Orders, the Court GRANTS the
motion for sanctions and imposes an additional $950 in sanctions against Plaintiff,
consisting of 2 hours at defense counsel’s hourly rate of $475, to be paid
within 20 days of the date of this Order.
Moving party to give notice.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
William A.
Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit
on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from
the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.