Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 22AHCV00922, Date: 2023-04-18 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22AHCV00922 Hearing Date: April 18, 2023 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 April
18, 2023 |
This partition action was
filed on October 26, 2022, by plaintiff William Henry Meurer
(“Plaintiff”). Plaintiff seeks partition
by sale of the real property at 1109 Avon Place in South Pasadena, California. Defendant Qinpei Li (“Defendant”) is
Plaintiff’s co-tenant and has allegedly refused to sell the property or buy out
Plaintiff’s interest in the property.
On February 27, 2023,
Plaintiff filed this motion for summary judgment pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure section 437c. Plaintiff failed
to give sufficient notice of this motion because Plaintiff served the motion by
mail, meaning that the earliest date this motion could be heard is on May 18,
2023. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 437c, subd.
(a) [75-day statutory period for notice increased by 5 days if notice served by
mail.)
Even if Plaintiff is correct
in asserting that, in the absence of a valid waiver, Plaintiff is statutorily
entitled to liquidate his interest in the jointly owned real property, as
stated in Code Civil Procedure §872.710 (b) ("Except as provided in
Section 872.730, partition as to concurrent interests in the property shall be
as of right unless barred by a valid waiver."), that statutory entitlement
does not give Plaintiff the right to ignore the notice requirements for motions
for summary judgment.
Accordingly, the motion is
TAKEN OFF CALENDAR.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all other
parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
William A.
Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |