Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 22STCV01598, Date: 2022-09-13 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV01598 Hearing Date: September 13, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
Nadia Gandarilla
Claimant Nadia Gandarilla (“Claimant”),
a minor, by and through her mother and Guardian Ad Litem, Vanessa Gandarilla
(“Petitioner”), has agreed to settle her claims against Defendant Liberty Lara in
exchange for $15,000. If approved, $4,434.41
will be used for medical expenses, $3,750 will be used for attorney’s fees, and
$553.05 will be used for non-medical expenses, leaving a balance of $6,262.54
for Claimant to be deposited into a blocked account, subject to withdrawal
only upon authorization of the court.
Court approval is required for all
settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate
Code §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code
Civ. Proc. § 372.) The petition must be
verified and “must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any
bearing on the reasonableness of the compromise, covenant, settlement, or
disposition.” (CRC 7.950.) The Court has reviewed the proposed
settlement and finds that it is fair and reasonable. Further, the requested attorney’s fees, which
amounts to approximately 25% of the total settlement, is fair and reasonable.
However, Items 8a(2) and 8a(3) are both
checked, which is duplicative.
Petitioner needs to clarify whether the settlement funds will be paid
directly to the providers. Accordingly,
the hearing on the petition is CONTINUED to September 21, 2022 so that a
revised proposed order may be submitted.
The proposed order must be filed no later than September 16, 2022.
Per California Rules of Court, Rule
7.952, Petitioner and Claimant must appear at the hearing, unless the Court
finds good cause to excuse their appearance.
The Court finds that Petitioner and Claimant’s appearances are not
necessary, but will require Petitioner’s counsel to appear.
Angelina Gandarilla
Claimant Angelina Gandarilla
(“Claimant”), a minor, by and through her mother and Guardian Ad Litem, Vanessa
Gandarilla (“Petitioner”), has agreed to settle her claims against Defendant Liberty
Lara in exchange for $15,000. If
approved, $4,568.51 will be used for medical expenses, $3,750 will be used for
attorney’s fees, and $553.05 will be used for non-medical expenses, leaving a
balance of $6,128.44c for Claimant to be deposited into a blocked account,
subject to withdrawal only upon authorization of the court.
Court approval is required for all
settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate
Code §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code
Civ. Proc. § 372.) The petition must be
verified and “must contain a full disclosure of all information that has any
bearing on the reasonableness of the compromise, covenant, settlement, or
disposition.” (CRC 7.950.) The Court has reviewed the proposed
settlement and finds that it is fair and reasonable. Further, the requested attorney’s fees, which
amounts to approximately 25% of the total settlement, is fair and reasonable. However, as pointed out by the Court in its
August 16, 2022 minute order, Items 8a(2) and 8a(3) of the proposed order are
both checked, which is duplicative, and it is unclear whether Petitioner is
requesting reimbursement for medical expenses.
Accordingly, the hearing on the
petition is CONTINUED to September 21, 2022 so that a revised proposed order
may be submitted. The proposed order
must be filed no later than September 16, 2022.
Per California Rules of Court, Rule
7.952, Petitioner and Claimant must appear at the hearing, unless the Court
finds good cause to excuse their appearance.
The Court finds that Petitioner and Claimant’s appearances are not
necessary, but will require Petitioner’s counsel to appear.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.