Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 22STCV17290, Date: 2022-12-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV17290 Hearing Date: December 14, 2022 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. SOUTHWEST
AIRLINES CO., et al., Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT CITY OF LOS ANGELES’ MOTION TO STRIKE Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. December
14, 2022 |
On May 25,
2022, plaintiff Robert E. Edmonson (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against
defendant City of Los Angeles (“Defendant”) and Southwest Airlines Co. On October 5, 2022, Defendant filed this
motion to strike Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages.
Any party,
within the time allowed to respond to a pleading may serve and file a notice of
motion to strike the whole or any part thereof.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 435, subd. (b)(1).)
The court may, upon a motion, or at any time in its discretion, and upon
terms it deems proper, strike any irrelevant, false, or improper matter
inserted in any pleading. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 436, subd. (a); Stafford v.
Shultz (1954) 42 Cal.2d 767, 782 [“Matter in a pleading which is not
essential to the claim is surplusage; probative facts are surplusage and may be
stricken out or disregarded”].) The
court may also strike all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in
conformity with California law, a court rule, or an order of the court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 436, subd. (b).) An immaterial or irrelevant allegation is one
that is not essential to the statement of a claim or defense; is neither
pertinent to nor supported by an otherwise sufficient claim or defense; or a
demand for judgment requesting relief not supported by the allegations of the
complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 431.10,
subd. (b).) The grounds for moving to
strike must appear on the face of the pleading or by way of judicial notice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437.)
“Before filing a motion to strike . . .
the moving party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party
who filed the pleading that is subject to the motion to strike for the purpose
of determining if an agreement can be reached that resolves the objections to
be raised in the motion to strike.”
(Code Civ. Proc., § 435.5, subd. (a).)
If no agreement is reached, the moving party shall file and serve with
the motion to strike a declaration stating either: (1) the means by which the
parties met and conferred and that the parties did not reach an agreement, or
(2) that the party who filed the pleading failed to respond to the meet and
confer request or otherwise failed to meet and confer in good faith. (Code Civ. Proc., § 435.5, subd. (a)(3).)
Defense
counsel declares that he sent multiple communications to Plaintiff’s counsel,
called Plaintiff’s counsel’s office, and left a message, but received no reply
to his attempts to meet and confer. The
meet and confer requirement is satisfied.
Defendant moves to strike Plaintiff’s
prayer for punitive damage. Government
Code section 818 provides: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a
public entity is not liable for damages awarded under Section 3294 of the Civil
Code or other damages imposed primarily for the sake of example and by way of
punishing the defendant.”
Here, Defendant is a public entity immune
from punitive damages. There is no
request for civil penalties which may make punitive damages remedial in some
nature. (See Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transp. Authority v. Superior Court (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th
261, 271 [providing narrow exception to Gov. Code § 818 for civil
penalties with remedial aim].)
Plaintiff did not oppose this motion to
show how leave to amend is possible.
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to strike is GRANTED without leave to
amend.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.