Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 23AHCV00503, Date: 2024-02-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23AHCV00503 Hearing Date: February 29, 2024 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 8:30
a.m. |
On January 24, 2024, Plaintiff Rebecca
Dean (“Plaintiff”) filed this motion for an order compelling defendant M.
Pernecky Management Corp. (“Defendant”) to serve initial responses to Special
Interrogatories (Set One). Plaintiff also requests that the Court impose
monetary sanctions against Defendant and defense counsel.
Where a party fails to serve timely
responses to discovery requests, the court may make an order compelling
responses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290.) However, on February 7, 2024,
Defendant filed a declaration from counsel stating that verified responses were
served on January 26, 2024. (Miller Decl., ¶¶ 4, 6.) Accordingly, the motion
for an order compelling responses is DENIED.
Nevertheless, sanctions may be awarded
under in favor of a party who files a motion to compel discovery, even though
the requested discovery was provided to the moving party after the motion was
filed. (C.R.C. 3.1348.)
Here, Plaintiff served her discovery
requests on August 7, 2023, but Defendant offers no reason for the delay in
providing its verified responses. Therefore, sanctions are imposed on Defendant
and counsel of record, jointly and severally, in the reduced amount of $310,
consisting of 1 hour at Plaintiff’s counsel’s hourly rate of $250 and a $60
filing fee, payable within 20 days of the date of this Order.
Moving party to give notice.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit
on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from
the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.