Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 23AHCV01932, Date: 2025-03-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23AHCV01932 Hearing Date: March 27, 2025 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 8:30
a.m. |
|
|
) |
|
On February 25, 2025, plaintiff Gary
Smith (“Plaintiff”) filed this motion for an order compelling defendant General
Motors LLC (“Defendant”) to produce their Person Most Knowledgeable (“PMK”) for
deposition in this lemon law action. The motion addresses eleven categories for
examination, Nos. 1 through 11. In Defendant’s opposition brief, Defendant
states it agreed to produce a deponent for Category Nos .1 and 5 through 11. (Opp.,
p. 6.) Since Defendant is willing to produce a PMK for these categories, the
Court GRANTS the motion with respect to Category Nos. 1 and 5 through 11 and
orders Defendant to produce a PMK within 30 days.
As for Category Nos. 2 through 4, the
Court GRANTS the motion in part because Defendant’s policies, procedures, and
guidelines regarding its warranties, handling of consumer complaints, and
compliance with the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act are relevant to the
issue of willfulness and whether Defendant is liable for a civil penalty. Further,
Defendant’s objections on the ground that the Categories also seek
confidential, proprietary, and trade secret information are overruled. Defendant
only submits the declaration of its attorney who fails to demonstrate how the
requested testimony about policies, procedures, and guidelines constitute trade
secrets.
Nevertheless, the Court limits the
testimony to be provided about Defendant’s policies, procedures, and guidelines
regarding warranties and consumer complaints to those applicable for 2023 (when
the lawsuit was filed) and provided to Defendant’s authorized repair facilities.
If a separate written policy, procedure, or manual exists regarding purchases
or buybacks applicable to vehicles sold or leased in California, the testimony
shall be limited to the policy/procedure/manual for the year the lawsuit was
filed and/or the year Plaintiff contends their vehicle qualified for
repurchase.
As with Category Nos. 1 and 5 through
11, Defendant is ordered to produce a PMK for Category Nos. 2 through 4 within
30 days.
No sanctions shall be imposed as none
were requested.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
William A.
Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit
on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from
the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.