Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 23AHCV02684, Date: 2025-05-05 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23AHCV02684 Hearing Date: May 5, 2025 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 8:30
a.m. |
Plaintiff Peter Saueracker
(“Plaintiff”) filed this action on November 15, 2023, and passed away on or
about January 29, 2025. Plaintiff’s surviving sister, Julia Wright (“Wright”)
now moves to be substituted as Plaintiff’s successor-in-interest in this
action. Defendant Stater Bros. Market filed a notice of non-opposition on April
22, 2025.
“A cause of action that survives the
death of the person entitled to commence an action or proceeding passes to the
decedent’s successor in interest . . . and an action may be commenced by the
decedent’s personal representatives or, if none, by the decedent’s successor in
interest.” (Code Civ. Proc., §
377.30.) After the death of a plaintiff,
the court, on motion, shall allow a pending action that does not abate to be
continued by the decedent’s personal representative or
successor-in-interest. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 377.31.) The person who seeks to commence or continue a pending action as the
decedent’s successor-in-interest shall execute and file an affidavit or
declaration stating: (1) the decedent’s name, (2) the date and place of
decedent’s death, (3) “No proceeding is now pending in California for
administration of the decedent’s estate,” (4) a copy of the final order showing
the distribution of the decedent’s cause of action to the
successor-in-interest, if the decedent’s estate was administered, (5) either
the affiant or declarant is the decedent’s successor in interest or the affiant
or declarant is authorized to act on behalf of the decedent’s successor in
interest, with facts in support thereof, (6) “No other person has a superior
right to commence the action or proceeding or to be substituted for the
decedent in the pending action or proceeding,” and (7) the statements are true,
under penalty of perjury. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 377.32.)
Wright submits a declaration with the
requisite statutory elements to support her request to be substituted as
Plaintiff’s successor-in-interest. She also submits declarations from her two
siblings, Thomas W. Saueracker and Andres Saueracker, who both state that they
have agreed to appoint Wright as the sole administrator for this action. All
siblings agree that each will receive 33.33% of any settlement or verdict from
this action.
In light of the foregoing, the
unopposed motion to substitute Wright as Plaintiff’s successor-in-interest is
GRANTED.
Moving party to give notice.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit
on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from
the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.