Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 24AHCV00241, Date: 2024-05-06 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 24AHCV00241    Hearing Date: May 6, 2024    Dept: 3

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST DISTRICT

 

TETRA TECH, INC., et al.,

                    Plaintiff(s),

          vs.

 

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

 

                    Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

      CASE NO.: 24AHCV00241

 

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE BY STACY M. MANOBIANCA

 

Dept. 3

8:30 a.m.

May 6, 2024

 

Stacy M. Manobianca (“Applicant”) seeks admission to appear as counsel pro hac vice to represent plaintiffs Tetra Tech, Inc. and Glumac  in this action along with Jeremiah Welch and Kathryn Kellner, who are active members of the State Bar of California. Applicant is a resident of New Jersey and is a member in good standing of the New York State Bar and the New Jersey State Bar. Applicant is not a resident of California and does not regularly engage in business in California. Applicant has not applied to appear pro hac vice in California State Court in the past two years.

The application complies with the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 9.40, including serving notice and required fees on the State Bar of California. The unopposed application is GRANTED. It is ordered that Stacy M. Manobianca be admitted to appear as counsel pro hac vice for the purpose of representing Tetra Tech, Inc. and Glumac in this action. Applicant shall be subject to all applicable rules of this Court.

 

Moving party to give notice.

Dated this 6th day of May 2024

 

 

    

 

William A. Crowfoot

Judge of the Superior Court

 

 

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.