Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 24NNCV00086, Date: 2024-09-19 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24NNCV00086 Hearing Date: September 19, 2024 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 8:30
a.m. |
|
|
) |
|
On March 4, 2024, plaintiff Xia Lu
(“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendants Junyi Zhou (“Zhou”), Xiaoyan
Chen (“Chen”), Shalom K. Braunstein (“Braunstein”), and Elite Asian Art
Auction, LLC (“Elite Auction”).
On April 29, 2024, Plaintiff dismissed
Braunstein from this action.
On July 31, 2024, Zhou and Chen
(collectively, “Defendants”) filed an answer.
On August 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed this
motion to strike Defendants’ answer as untimely. Plaintiff claims that
Defendants were served on March 13, 2024, therefore Defendants’ answer had to
be filed within 30 days of being served.
At the time Defendants filed their
answer on July 31, 2024, no default had yet been entered against them.
Furthermore, in opposition, Defendants explain that they did not become aware
of this action until July 31, 2024, and immediately filed an answer the same
day. (Defs. Decl., ¶¶ 3-5.) Defendants declare that they were not personally
served with the summons and complaint and were not aware of Plaintiff’s prior unsuccessful
attempts to enter default against them on April 22 and June 3, 2024. (Id.,
¶¶ 3, 7-8.)
In light of these facts, the Court
DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to strike. Although Defendants’ answer was untimely,
the inability to file an answer earlier appears to be due to Plaintiff’s failure
to serve them with the summons and complaint.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
William A.
Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit
on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from
the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.