Judge: William A. Crowfoot, Case: 24NNCV04844, Date: 2025-06-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24NNCV04844 Hearing Date: June 4, 2025 Dept: 3
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - NORTHEAST
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
3 8:30
a.m. |
On April 17, 2025, plaintiff Angelica
J. Vargas (“Plaintiff”) filed this motion to deem Requests for Admission (Set
One), propounded to defendant LA Auto Center, LLC (“Defendant”) admitted. The
requests for admission were served on January 27, 2028. (Glassey Decl., ¶ 1.)
Defendant’s responses were initially due by February 28, 2025, but to date, no
responses have been served. (Ibid.)
Where a party fails to timely respond
to a request for admission, the propounding party may move for an order that
the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the
requests be deemed admitted. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (b).) The
court shall grant a motion to deem admitted requests for admissions, “unless it
finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has
served, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests
for admission that is in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220.” (Code
Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).)
Defendant did not oppose this motion
and it is undisputed that Defendant failed to serve responses to Plaintiff’s
Requests for Admission. Accordingly, the motion to deem admitted is GRANTED.
Where a party fails to provide a timely
response to requests for admission, “[i]t is mandatory that the court impose a
monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) on the
party or attorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response to
requests for admission necessitated this motion.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280,
subd. (c).)
Plaintiff requests sanctions in the
amount of $3,248 for having to bring this motion, consisting of 3 hours to
draft the motion at an hourly rate of $595, and 1.8 hours to review an
opposition brief, draft a reply brief, and attend a hearing. Plaintiff also
requests $297.50 for the half hour spent sending emails meeting and conferring
with defense counsel, as well as $72.50 and $22 for filing the motion and reply
papers, respectively. The amount requested is excessive given the motion’s simplicity
– the memorandum of points and authorities is only 3 pages long and does not
include any extensive legal analysis. Therefore, the request for sanctions is
GRANTED and imposed against Defendant in the reduced amount of $667.5,
consisting of 1 hour at counsel’s hourly rate of $595 and $72.50 in filing
costs, to be paid within 20 days of the date of this Order.
Moving party to give notice.
Dated
this
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Crowfoot Judge of the Superior Court |
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at ALHDEPT3@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit
on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from
the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.